By definition, mutilation is a disfiguring wound. Circumcision is literally that, on a genital.
Can men not get raped either because the "better known" version is penis forced into vagina? Not be victims of domestic abuse because the "better known" version is drunk husband physically hitting a woman?
By definition, mutilation is a disfiguring wound. Circumcision is literally that, on a genital.
Can men not get raped either because the "better known" version is penis forced into vagina? Not be victims of domestic abuse because the "better known" version is drunk husband physically hitting a woman?