I disagree. Anyone who can associate with "people" who are lower than cockroaches definitely has something wrong with them.
But they aren't and it's an insult to humanity to consider them so. Exploiting broken men for money isn't a job.
I don't consider it voluntary, it's more coerced. If feminist women break the self-worth of boys and then women profit off the exploitation of them as adults, how is that not questionable?
Does not that imply there have been broken men forever, world's oldest profession after all? The ancient world certainly didn't have feminism, did it?
I've had issues trying to simultaneously understand both prudish modern attitudes towards compensated fucking while at the same time understand modern simp culture (which I'd more easily accept is exploitation of broken men).
The world is fucked up. There are mentally ill people, damaged people, evil people, and irreparably fucked up people walking around us each and every day.
While I do agree with most of your central thesis around these parts, I disagree vehemently with you here. Of course these women in question are exploiting men and of course I find it questionable, but I can't disagree with the other guy that it's interesting precisely for those reasons.
How are we ever going to get past it and grow if we don't have good researchers studying the hows and whys?
I'm not a simp just because I find sex work to be interesting as a curiosity, you dumbfuck.
They literally are. You're so fucking weird. My comment was in general agreement with the spirit of your post and yet you attack me.
They provide a service in exchange for a fee as part of a voluntary exchange. It is the very definition of a useful service.
I disagree. Anyone who can associate with "people" who are lower than cockroaches definitely has something wrong with them.
But they aren't and it's an insult to humanity to consider them so. Exploiting broken men for money isn't a job.
I don't consider it voluntary, it's more coerced. If feminist women break the self-worth of boys and then women profit off the exploitation of them as adults, how is that not questionable?
Does not that imply there have been broken men forever, world's oldest profession after all? The ancient world certainly didn't have feminism, did it?
I've had issues trying to simultaneously understand both prudish modern attitudes towards compensated fucking while at the same time understand modern simp culture (which I'd more easily accept is exploitation of broken men).
You choose to die on some weird hills, Imp.
The world is fucked up. There are mentally ill people, damaged people, evil people, and irreparably fucked up people walking around us each and every day.
While I do agree with most of your central thesis around these parts, I disagree vehemently with you here. Of course these women in question are exploiting men and of course I find it questionable, but I can't disagree with the other guy that it's interesting precisely for those reasons.
How are we ever going to get past it and grow if we don't have good researchers studying the hows and whys?
I do, but I believe strongly in what I say.
What is there to study? They hate men so they exploit them. It's really simple.
What mechanisms do they exploit? What biological factors? What sociological factors? What psychological factors? What is cultural? What is innate?
All of these are valuable questions if we are to understand the damage and rectify it.
Again, we are more allies than enemies but I disagree with you on this.