raises hand I downvote you because I get tired of reading your constant name calling and paranoid persecution delusions.
I don't visit 'ConPro' and I don't hate the Jews. I also don't 'stalk' you, I just click on a thread that looks like it might have some discussion and instead see that instead, you've shit up the entire thing with reply after reply after (usually off-topic) reply, and I downvote all the ones that meet the above criteria. I leave the ones where you aren't completely insane alone (sometimes I'll even upvote!) in the hopes that maybe you'll take it as constructive criticism and learn something.
It's generally easier than wasting time engaging with you. And no, I don't follow-up on posts in which I've responded to you. I don't care enough.
If you stalk-downvote a user, then that not only shows that you're a loser with no life, but you're also breaking the forum by trying to get less visibility for content that users otherwise appreciate.
i already answered him on the other comment. I dont downvote him (unless he says something stupid) nor do i stalk him, i was only saying its retarded to compare downvotes to censors and bans.
didnt deny what? i myself dont downvote you ( i dont downvote much in general) unless you say something really stupid if thats what you are asking. im just saying its retarded to compare downvoting to censors and bans.
Do you think anyone agrees with that? its not a competition on who gets banned first. Also did anyone else have their entire dot win domain wiped out because of wrong think like Conpro did?
It's not novel, it's not clever, it's just the same old, same old - posted on every thread even where it is supremely irrelevant.
Says the people who downvote me to the bottom of every single post here as a form of censorship.
raises hand I downvote you because I get tired of reading your constant name calling and paranoid persecution delusions.
I don't visit 'ConPro' and I don't hate the Jews. I also don't 'stalk' you, I just click on a thread that looks like it might have some discussion and instead see that instead, you've shit up the entire thing with reply after reply after (usually off-topic) reply, and I downvote all the ones that meet the above criteria. I leave the ones where you aren't completely insane alone (sometimes I'll even upvote!) in the hopes that maybe you'll take it as constructive criticism and learn something.
It's generally easier than wasting time engaging with you. And no, I don't follow-up on posts in which I've responded to you. I don't care enough.
Imagine comparing downvoting to getting censored and banned.
If you stalk-downvote a user, then that not only shows that you're a loser with no life, but you're also breaking the forum by trying to get less visibility for content that users otherwise appreciate.
i already answered him on the other comment. I dont downvote him (unless he says something stupid) nor do i stalk him, i was only saying its retarded to compare downvotes to censors and bans.
I just want to highlight that he (she?) didn't deny it.
didnt deny what? i myself dont downvote you ( i dont downvote much in general) unless you say something really stupid if thats what you are asking. im just saying its retarded to compare downvoting to censors and bans.
We were censored before you. TRP was the first wave of quarantines, ConPro was the 3rd.
Even MGTOW was banned before you after a really strange glow op.
Do you think anyone agrees with that? its not a competition on who gets banned first. Also did anyone else have their entire dot win domain wiped out because of wrong think like Conpro did?