Good commonsense judgement on the part of her administration:
'“Personal opinions on really sensitive matters don’t belong in the classroom,” Daniel insisted. “It’s up to the families to provide education on some of these really sensitive issues. It is not the role of the school district to do that.”'
The source, however, dishonestly pictures a kindergarten class or a class decidedly younger than high school age in the article's illustration, taking advantage of the fact that a large number of "readers" do not actually read beyond the headline.
Good commonsense judgement on the part of her administration:
'“Personal opinions on really sensitive matters don’t belong in the classroom,” Daniel insisted. “It’s up to the families to provide education on some of these really sensitive issues. It is not the role of the school district to do that.”'
The source, however, dishonestly pictures a kindergarten class or a class decidedly younger than high school age in the article's illustration, taking advantage of the fact that a large number of "readers" do not actually read beyond the headline.
Yeah, this one smells a bit fishy. I'm reserving judgement until I see a full video.
Your instincts may be correct. It's coming to light that the situation may not be as cut and dry as initially represented:
NotTheBee - This Texas teacher was fired for saying we shouldn't judge pedophiles "just because they want to have sex with a 5-year-old" ... but it might be a masterclass in things taken out of context
EDIT: u/Galean FYI