Ask the Ukrainians, they would disagree. They can have as many children as they'd like, but their women will still stab them in the back.
Not one Ukrainian agrees with your usual sperging.
Also, you didn't answer which civilization survived without childrearing, just like you refused 7 times in a row to address how come there are more boys born than girls if the Evil Wimenz are aborting boys en masse as you also claim.
I'm starting to think that you might not be the most rational guy around.
Female in-group bias is a thing.
lol, you said that 4 billion women are co-ordinating "lies" and "actions" to get marriage laws changed to the benefit of women. Literal insanity.
lol, you said that 4 billion women are co-ordinating "lies" and "actions" to get marriage laws changed to the benefit of women. Literal insanity.
Weird how easily people can make the logical leap from "they have the same race or gender" to "they're all coordinating and collaborating with one another to accomplish some nefarious objective".
Right, the people being left to die while "their" women are riding strange dick abroad are totally on women's side and don't want to go home at all.
Speaking of avoiding answering things, I said by any measurable metric marriage and children are a terrible idea. So name one measurable gain for the individual.
I didn't say four billion, you did. It's more like a few hundred million.
Right, the people being left to die while "their" women are riding strange dick abroad are totally on women's side and don't want to go home at all.
What? You really talk like you've never been outside. You know that men fighting in wars is the way it's been since the beginning of time, right? And that wasn't because Scipio wanted to start "a women's war" to please his More Feminine Masters.
Speaking of avoiding answering things, I said by any measurable metric marriage and children are a terrible idea. So name one measurable gain for the individual.
Suddenly, "for the individual" was added, because you knew full well that societal collapse is a pretty bad metric for your anti-marriage and anti-childbearing nonsense.
I didn't say four billion, you did. It's more like a few hundred million.
That is less crazy, because as you hopefully know, the larger the number in a given conspiracy - the less likely it is to be kept secret.
Now, a few hundred million is at most 20% or so of women. If you kept your complaints about them, I think nearly everyone here would agree with you.
Ask the Ukrainians, they would disagree. They can have as many children as they'd like, but their women will still stab them in the back.
Female in-group bias is a thing.
Not one Ukrainian agrees with your usual sperging.
Also, you didn't answer which civilization survived without childrearing, just like you refused 7 times in a row to address how come there are more boys born than girls if the Evil Wimenz are aborting boys en masse as you also claim.
I'm starting to think that you might not be the most rational guy around.
lol, you said that 4 billion women are co-ordinating "lies" and "actions" to get marriage laws changed to the benefit of women. Literal insanity.
Weird how easily people can make the logical leap from "they have the same race or gender" to "they're all coordinating and collaborating with one another to accomplish some nefarious objective".
The human mind is a strange thing.
Well no it's not mass coordination, it's just innate in their nature because they're resource leeching little worms.
You're both ridiculous. He takes the misogyny too far and you don't take it far enough.
Right, the people being left to die while "their" women are riding strange dick abroad are totally on women's side and don't want to go home at all.
Speaking of avoiding answering things, I said by any measurable metric marriage and children are a terrible idea. So name one measurable gain for the individual.
I didn't say four billion, you did. It's more like a few hundred million.
What? You really talk like you've never been outside. You know that men fighting in wars is the way it's been since the beginning of time, right? And that wasn't because Scipio wanted to start "a women's war" to please his More Feminine Masters.
Suddenly, "for the individual" was added, because you knew full well that societal collapse is a pretty bad metric for your anti-marriage and anti-childbearing nonsense.
That is less crazy, because as you hopefully know, the larger the number in a given conspiracy - the less likely it is to be kept secret.
Now, a few hundred million is at most 20% or so of women. If you kept your complaints about them, I think nearly everyone here would agree with you.
Let's be honest...most wars were for survival back then, not because some whiny unelected feminist decided she wanted a high male death toll.
Talking about what society wants is communist.