Let's say a ban or mandated testing/vaccine for travel/large gatherings.
That is not a 'lockdown' though. You are setting the bar very low, because now you know that it will count to your success/failure rate (so far only failure) when it comes to predictions.
I'm not accepting this, because I'd say there is about a 15% chance of this actually happening. It's not out there like your usual.
Blocking travel was one of the things that Johnson's government kept even when the lockdowns were easing.
I'm basing my prediction off a return to the old lockdown system at the lowest level. It could easily be worse, but the economy is so fragile that it prevents her doing what she'd like to do.
Blocking travel was one of the things that Johnson's government kept even when the lockdowns were easing.
So it's not a lockdown, as you yourself here admit.
Don't be shy. The MORE FEMININE WAY is trying to crash the economy, isn't it?
I'm basing my prediction off a return to the old lockdown system at the lowest level. It could easily be worse, but the economy is so fragile that it prevents her doing what she'd like to do.
I'd feel bad about holding this against you.
Because it appears that you have learned from your mistake.
You're now even admitting that you could be wrong about a scenario that is not wildly implausible. Normally, you'd be saying that you were absolutely sure about something that was wildly unlikely.
You're now even admitting that you could be wrong about a scenario that is not wildly implausible. Normally, you'd be saying that you were absolutely sure about something that was wildly unlikely.
Well, before, their only constraint was how far they were willing to go. Now, with the energy crisis, the failing economies all over the world, they can't really go full "turn the systems of patriarchy against their creators" without the very real risk of complete societal collapse, which is a situation that does not favor anyone with a lot of people who hate them, particularly those who are naturally weak.
That is not a 'lockdown' though. You are setting the bar very low, because now you know that it will count to your success/failure rate (so far only failure) when it comes to predictions.
I'm not accepting this, because I'd say there is about a 15% chance of this actually happening. It's not out there like your usual.
Blocking travel was one of the things that Johnson's government kept even when the lockdowns were easing.
I'm basing my prediction off a return to the old lockdown system at the lowest level. It could easily be worse, but the economy is so fragile that it prevents her doing what she'd like to do.
So it's not a lockdown, as you yourself here admit.
Don't be shy. The MORE FEMININE WAY is trying to crash the economy, isn't it?
I'd feel bad about holding this against you.
Because it appears that you have learned from your mistake.
You're now even admitting that you could be wrong about a scenario that is not wildly implausible. Normally, you'd be saying that you were absolutely sure about something that was wildly unlikely.
Well, before, their only constraint was how far they were willing to go. Now, with the energy crisis, the failing economies all over the world, they can't really go full "turn the systems of patriarchy against their creators" without the very real risk of complete societal collapse, which is a situation that does not favor anyone with a lot of people who hate them, particularly those who are naturally weak.
You grossly overestimate your party. As far as I can tell, it consists of you and your dick created out of skin from your arm.