I can see why she would be terrified of Covid. This video is from February 2021, by the way.
And the specifics of your 'prediction' about lockdowns by January? I'm pretty sure you'd use the tiniest restriction as proof that you were supposedly right, so please define what would count as 'lockdown'.
I'll set the bar fairly low, because I'm not sure how far she will go without being shot down by big business. The UK economy can't survive another full lockdown.
Let's say a ban or mandated testing/vaccine for travel/large gatherings.
Let's say a ban or mandated testing/vaccine for travel/large gatherings.
That is not a 'lockdown' though. You are setting the bar very low, because now you know that it will count to your success/failure rate (so far only failure) when it comes to predictions.
I'm not accepting this, because I'd say there is about a 15% chance of this actually happening. It's not out there like your usual.
Blocking travel was one of the things that Johnson's government kept even when the lockdowns were easing.
I'm basing my prediction off a return to the old lockdown system at the lowest level. It could easily be worse, but the economy is so fragile that it prevents her doing what she'd like to do.
Blocking travel was one of the things that Johnson's government kept even when the lockdowns were easing.
So it's not a lockdown, as you yourself here admit.
Don't be shy. The MORE FEMININE WAY is trying to crash the economy, isn't it?
I'm basing my prediction off a return to the old lockdown system at the lowest level. It could easily be worse, but the economy is so fragile that it prevents her doing what she'd like to do.
I'd feel bad about holding this against you.
Because it appears that you have learned from your mistake.
You're now even admitting that you could be wrong about a scenario that is not wildly implausible. Normally, you'd be saying that you were absolutely sure about something that was wildly unlikely.
I can see why she would be terrified of Covid. This video is from February 2021, by the way.
And the specifics of your 'prediction' about lockdowns by January? I'm pretty sure you'd use the tiniest restriction as proof that you were supposedly right, so please define what would count as 'lockdown'.
I'll set the bar fairly low, because I'm not sure how far she will go without being shot down by big business. The UK economy can't survive another full lockdown.
Let's say a ban or mandated testing/vaccine for travel/large gatherings.
That is not a 'lockdown' though. You are setting the bar very low, because now you know that it will count to your success/failure rate (so far only failure) when it comes to predictions.
I'm not accepting this, because I'd say there is about a 15% chance of this actually happening. It's not out there like your usual.
Blocking travel was one of the things that Johnson's government kept even when the lockdowns were easing.
I'm basing my prediction off a return to the old lockdown system at the lowest level. It could easily be worse, but the economy is so fragile that it prevents her doing what she'd like to do.
So it's not a lockdown, as you yourself here admit.
Don't be shy. The MORE FEMININE WAY is trying to crash the economy, isn't it?
I'd feel bad about holding this against you.
Because it appears that you have learned from your mistake.
You're now even admitting that you could be wrong about a scenario that is not wildly implausible. Normally, you'd be saying that you were absolutely sure about something that was wildly unlikely.