Blocking travel was one of the things that Johnson's government kept even when the lockdowns were easing.
So it's not a lockdown, as you yourself here admit.
Don't be shy. The MORE FEMININE WAY is trying to crash the economy, isn't it?
I'm basing my prediction off a return to the old lockdown system at the lowest level. It could easily be worse, but the economy is so fragile that it prevents her doing what she'd like to do.
I'd feel bad about holding this against you.
Because it appears that you have learned from your mistake.
You're now even admitting that you could be wrong about a scenario that is not wildly implausible. Normally, you'd be saying that you were absolutely sure about something that was wildly unlikely.
You're now even admitting that you could be wrong about a scenario that is not wildly implausible. Normally, you'd be saying that you were absolutely sure about something that was wildly unlikely.
Well, before, their only constraint was how far they were willing to go. Now, with the energy crisis, the failing economies all over the world, they can't really go full "turn the systems of patriarchy against their creators" without the very real risk of complete societal collapse, which is a situation that does not favor anyone with a lot of people who hate them, particularly those who are naturally weak.
I don't think it's hard to believe that the people who preside over a large economic crash will be hated and possibly attacked by those who lost everything.
So it's not a lockdown, as you yourself here admit.
Don't be shy. The MORE FEMININE WAY is trying to crash the economy, isn't it?
I'd feel bad about holding this against you.
Because it appears that you have learned from your mistake.
You're now even admitting that you could be wrong about a scenario that is not wildly implausible. Normally, you'd be saying that you were absolutely sure about something that was wildly unlikely.
Well, before, their only constraint was how far they were willing to go. Now, with the energy crisis, the failing economies all over the world, they can't really go full "turn the systems of patriarchy against their creators" without the very real risk of complete societal collapse, which is a situation that does not favor anyone with a lot of people who hate them, particularly those who are naturally weak.
You grossly overestimate your party. As far as I can tell, it consists of you and your dick created out of skin from your arm.
I don't think it's hard to believe that the people who preside over a large economic crash will be hated and possibly attacked by those who lost everything.
No one but you believes that "women" are presiding over anything.
If you could just distinguish between your craziness and the real world, that'd be great.