It's also completely hypocritical. They never care about the "harm" done by "data" that shows how white people or men are evil or oppressive. It's just an a priori assumption that it's true and therefore just fine to report on.
Its because publishing, as a field, is overwhelmingly controlled by women. It is safe, indoors, clean, social, and doesn't have any objective criteria for performance.
So of course "professional" women jump on whatever current trend and herdmind that is going around.
Honestly makes me sad how scientific publications have bent the knee to this nonsense. I can handle unflattering information.
It's also completely hypocritical. They never care about the "harm" done by "data" that shows how white people or men are evil or oppressive. It's just an a priori assumption that it's true and therefore just fine to report on.
I know! That’s what is most annoying
Its because publishing, as a field, is overwhelmingly controlled by women. It is safe, indoors, clean, social, and doesn't have any objective criteria for performance.
So of course "professional" women jump on whatever current trend and herdmind that is going around.
Women = college graduates = woke totalitarian assholes and the soyboys who want to fuck them..