What I was thinking of were the times when Ben Shapiro said that it was antisemitism to claim that Jews controlled mainstream media, when it's objectively true that they're the CEOs and other higher ups in the echelons of nearly every major network, from CNN, NBC, New York Times, NPR to many more.
So why not stick to objective facts, rather than the claim that "Jews control mainstream media", which sounds whacked on its face? Control is far more thorough than just having a few CEO positions.
This sort of comment is what SJWs say about whites, and surprisingly, you don't have an issue calling it out as anti-white then.
Jews are defacto at the top of any oppression period to the point where no one even needs to point it out.
Might want to take into account when that 'criticism' is so classified.
Never when you criticize a Jew who is on the right.
What is being protected here?
But then again, none of this classification applies to those who are not woke. Clarence Thomas ranks below any white man, because he is not obedient.
So why not stick to objective facts, rather than the claim that "Jews control mainstream media", which sounds whacked on its face? Control is far more thorough than just having a few CEO positions.
This sort of comment is what SJWs say about whites, and surprisingly, you don't have an issue calling it out as anti-white then.
Man it's worse than that, you criticize banks and media and you immediately get called an antisemite too