Yeah, I don't think people considered that in recent history. I'm talking about the people who want to go back to two kids, a housewife and a picket fence in their idyllic 1950s fantasy.
They have been posting guides on how to illegally acquire misoprostol and other things like it. Their public position is that they are scared, their private position is one of defiance, that the feminist puppet organisations like YouTube will back them up.
I'm talking about the people who want to go back to two kids, a housewife and a picket fence in their idyllic 1950s fantasy.
That will be the end result. But you have to remember that the 1950s allowed for the 1960s, and the present disaster. Any time you want to restore something, you have to account for that.
They have been posting guides on how to illegally acquire misoprostol and other things like it. Their public position is that they are scared, their private position is one of defiance, that the feminist puppet organisations like YouTube will back them up.
Posting guides is not illegal. Yes, part of the 'acting scared' is just in order to create a backlash, but I have no doubt at all that these organizations are extremely risk-averse. Have you ever seen SJWs do anything risky? Or even something that does not get them plaudits from their fellow lowlifes?
Not holding feminists accountable for this harm now will end up with us right back here in a few decades. This ends when it's treated as the threat it is.
I'm pretty sure that it's illegal to possess things like the Anarchist's Cookbook and guides to 3D printing guns.
I'm pretty sure that it's illegal to possess things like the Anarchist's Cookbook and guides to 3D printing guns.
It is not illegal in the USA. Nor should it be illegal.
Not holding feminists accountable for this harm now will end up with us right back here in a few decades. This ends when it's treated as the threat it is.
Yeah, I don't think people considered that in recent history. I'm talking about the people who want to go back to two kids, a housewife and a picket fence in their idyllic 1950s fantasy.
They have been posting guides on how to illegally acquire misoprostol and other things like it. Their public position is that they are scared, their private position is one of defiance, that the feminist puppet organisations like YouTube will back them up.
That will be the end result. But you have to remember that the 1950s allowed for the 1960s, and the present disaster. Any time you want to restore something, you have to account for that.
Posting guides is not illegal. Yes, part of the 'acting scared' is just in order to create a backlash, but I have no doubt at all that these organizations are extremely risk-averse. Have you ever seen SJWs do anything risky? Or even something that does not get them plaudits from their fellow lowlifes?
You just have to create the risks for them.
Not holding feminists accountable for this harm now will end up with us right back here in a few decades. This ends when it's treated as the threat it is.
I'm pretty sure that it's illegal to possess things like the Anarchist's Cookbook and guides to 3D printing guns.
It is not illegal in the USA. Nor should it be illegal.
I agree.
We'll end up right back here if we keep liberal philosophy, culture, and political and economic structures.
I'm pretty sure paying for women's mortgages won't make it better.