It need not be a net increase in taxation, which will not be very usefully spent by politicians. But it's possible to reduce the tax burden on families with children while single men pay their fair share, which should encourage families and reduce bachelorhood.
Maybe encourage women to stop being absolute trash, instead of forcing men to continue to subsidize their absolute trashiness.
Maybe don't punish a father whose useless cunt of a wife kicked him out of the house for not being around enough to suit her after he had to get a second job due to her refusal to work.
Maybe forcing young men who can't find any woman worth being with, whose work life already makes it effectively impossible for them to afford to have children anyway, to pay even more into a system that already treats them like second class citizens is not going to encourage them to have families, but rather will only make them feel even more alienated and unmotivated.
Maybe encourage women to stop being absolute trash
This is as likely to work as "teaching men not to rape". People are not going to stop being absolute trash because someone lectured them, and same for rapists.
Maybe don't punish a father whose useless cunt of a wife kicked him out of the house for not being around enough to suit her after he had to get a second job due to her refusal to work.
Except that's exactly what a bachelor tax would do.
It would punish men who are already in dire financial and emotional straits because their relationships fell apart, often through no fault of their own.
It would punish young men who want to be in a relationship but can't find a woman worth being with because our society, encouraged by leftist simps and tradcuck simps alike, refuses to hold women responsible for their own behaviour.
It would punish young men who, despite that, are willing to settle for any woman, no matter how fetid a pile of trash she is, but are still single because she thinks she can do better than him.
It would solve none of the problems you believe it would solve: it would only make literally all of them worse.
It would punish men who are already in dire financial and emotional straits because their relationships fell apart, often through no fault of their own.
You know, there used to be a solution for this sort of thing, until some advocates of supposed 'progress' decided that it was but one step in the dismantling of civilization.
It would punish young men who want to be in a relationship but can't find a woman worth being with because our society, encouraged by leftist simps and tradcuck simps alike, refuses to hold women responsible for their own behaviour.
Give some examples of how 'tradcuck simps' refuse to hold women 'responsible'.
It would punish young men who, despite that, are willing to settle for any woman, no matter how fetid a pile of trash she is, because she thinks she can do better than him.
Like I said, there was a 2 millennia old solution for this before people decided that they knew better, and that nothing could go wrong.
It would achieve none of the things you believe it would achieve, it would only make literally all of them worse.
I know full well that this on its own isn't going to solve a thing. It needs to be paired with a broader return to stuff that actually worked.
Nay, son. Having children is necessary for the survival of the community, so those who do not have them should be taxed in order to make it more affordable for those who do their fair share for this survival of the community.
So how high should a bachelor tax be? You said the Nazis put it at 5%, but that sounds rather low to me.
Anyway, you better learn to live with it. Carrie has decreed it, and she'll soon blackmail leaders in Europe and have the ECB bribe them to adopt the same policy.
It need not be a net increase in taxation, which will not be very usefully spent by politicians. But it's possible to reduce the tax burden on families with children while single men pay their fair share, which should encourage families and reduce bachelorhood.
Or you could have massive immigration.
Maybe encourage women to stop being absolute trash, instead of forcing men to continue to subsidize their absolute trashiness.
Maybe don't punish a father whose useless cunt of a wife kicked him out of the house for not being around enough to suit her after he had to get a second job due to her refusal to work.
Maybe forcing young men who can't find any woman worth being with, whose work life already makes it effectively impossible for them to afford to have children anyway, to pay even more into a system that already treats them like second class citizens is not going to encourage them to have families, but rather will only make them feel even more alienated and unmotivated.
This is as likely to work as "teaching men not to rape". People are not going to stop being absolute trash because someone lectured them, and same for rapists.
Yes.
Except that's exactly what a bachelor tax would do.
It would punish men who are already in dire financial and emotional straits because their relationships fell apart, often through no fault of their own.
It would punish young men who want to be in a relationship but can't find a woman worth being with because our society, encouraged by leftist simps and tradcuck simps alike, refuses to hold women responsible for their own behaviour.
It would punish young men who, despite that, are willing to settle for any woman, no matter how fetid a pile of trash she is, but are still single because she thinks she can do better than him.
It would solve none of the problems you believe it would solve: it would only make literally all of them worse.
You know, there used to be a solution for this sort of thing, until some advocates of supposed 'progress' decided that it was but one step in the dismantling of civilization.
Give some examples of how 'tradcuck simps' refuse to hold women 'responsible'.
Like I said, there was a 2 millennia old solution for this before people decided that they knew better, and that nothing could go wrong.
I know full well that this on its own isn't going to solve a thing. It needs to be paired with a broader return to stuff that actually worked.
Having children is a choice. A choice that you should pay for, not expect people you don't like to be taxed to pay for.
Nay, son. Having children is necessary for the survival of the community, so those who do not have them should be taxed in order to make it more affordable for those who do their fair share for this survival of the community.
So how high should a bachelor tax be? You said the Nazis put it at 5%, but that sounds rather low to me.
Anyway, you better learn to live with it. Carrie has decreed it, and she'll soon blackmail leaders in Europe and have the ECB bribe them to adopt the same policy.
By that logic, we should tax single mothers extra for the extra strain their horrid parenting causes society.
I'd be fine with that, but for the fact that they have no money and that this would harm the children even further.