Maybe encourage women to stop being absolute trash
This is as likely to work as "teaching men not to rape". People are not going to stop being absolute trash because someone lectured them, and same for rapists.
Maybe don't punish a father whose useless cunt of a wife kicked him out of the house for not being around enough to suit her after he had to get a second job due to her refusal to work.
Except that's exactly what a bachelor tax would do.
It would punish men who are already in dire financial and emotional straits because their relationships fell apart, often through no fault of their own.
It would punish young men who want to be in a relationship but can't find a woman worth being with because our society, encouraged by leftist simps and tradcuck simps alike, refuses to hold women responsible for their own behaviour.
It would punish young men who, despite that, are willing to settle for any woman, no matter how fetid a pile of trash she is, but are still single because she thinks she can do better than him.
It would solve none of the problems you believe it would solve: it would only make literally all of them worse.
It would punish men who are already in dire financial and emotional straits because their relationships fell apart, often through no fault of their own.
You know, there used to be a solution for this sort of thing, until some advocates of supposed 'progress' decided that it was but one step in the dismantling of civilization.
It would punish young men who want to be in a relationship but can't find a woman worth being with because our society, encouraged by leftist simps and tradcuck simps alike, refuses to hold women responsible for their own behaviour.
Give some examples of how 'tradcuck simps' refuse to hold women 'responsible'.
It would punish young men who, despite that, are willing to settle for any woman, no matter how fetid a pile of trash she is, because she thinks she can do better than him.
Like I said, there was a 2 millennia old solution for this before people decided that they knew better, and that nothing could go wrong.
It would achieve none of the things you believe it would achieve, it would only make literally all of them worse.
I know full well that this on its own isn't going to solve a thing. It needs to be paired with a broader return to stuff that actually worked.
Give some examples of how 'tradcuck simps' refuse to hold women responsible
Cheerleading a policy aimed at forcing young men into relationships with women who don't deserve them, rather than encouraging women to engage in the introspection and self-improvement necessary to make themselves into desirable dating prospects is refusing to hold women responsible for their behaviour.
The epidemic of single men was not caused by the single men. It was caused by women, and punishing men is not going to solve it.
Cheerleading a policy aimed at forcing young men into relationships with women who don't deserve them
Rather solipsistic of you to think that it's all about 'young men'. Who says young women want relationships? And for that matter, young men aren't much to write home about either.
rather than encouraging women to engage in the introspection and self-improvement necessary to make themselves into desirable dating prospects
Are there women beating down the doors of these 'young men' who are addicted to porn, video games and who are badly out of shape? Or could it just be that they themselves are also deeply undesirable?
This is as likely to work as "teaching men not to rape". People are not going to stop being absolute trash because someone lectured them, and same for rapists.
Yes.
Except that's exactly what a bachelor tax would do.
It would punish men who are already in dire financial and emotional straits because their relationships fell apart, often through no fault of their own.
It would punish young men who want to be in a relationship but can't find a woman worth being with because our society, encouraged by leftist simps and tradcuck simps alike, refuses to hold women responsible for their own behaviour.
It would punish young men who, despite that, are willing to settle for any woman, no matter how fetid a pile of trash she is, but are still single because she thinks she can do better than him.
It would solve none of the problems you believe it would solve: it would only make literally all of them worse.
You know, there used to be a solution for this sort of thing, until some advocates of supposed 'progress' decided that it was but one step in the dismantling of civilization.
Give some examples of how 'tradcuck simps' refuse to hold women 'responsible'.
Like I said, there was a 2 millennia old solution for this before people decided that they knew better, and that nothing could go wrong.
I know full well that this on its own isn't going to solve a thing. It needs to be paired with a broader return to stuff that actually worked.
Cheerleading a policy aimed at forcing young men into relationships with women who don't deserve them, rather than encouraging women to engage in the introspection and self-improvement necessary to make themselves into desirable dating prospects is refusing to hold women responsible for their behaviour.
The epidemic of single men was not caused by the single men. It was caused by women, and punishing men is not going to solve it.
Rather solipsistic of you to think that it's all about 'young men'. Who says young women want relationships? And for that matter, young men aren't much to write home about either.
Are there women beating down the doors of these 'young men' who are addicted to porn, video games and who are badly out of shape? Or could it just be that they themselves are also deeply undesirable?
Marriage doesn't work. It died when you could buy a machine to keep your house for you. It's a relic, a contract that makes no sense.
Does that machine also create kids and raise them for you?
Unfortunately, there goes your dream of a woman-free world.
BTW, where is that 'male curfew' you were so sure was coming?