No, justice failed when she wasn't in jail by 1960.
But setting the example still matters. Proving how hateful women were still matters.
I'd love for all the race grifters to learn the truth about their "allies" when it comes to lynching. It was nearly always co-ordinated by women, off something a woman stated, using the strength of men to enforce it.
"Women are wonderful" effect. None of them questioned it.
Ironically, women's vile ranting about not being in control of their actions that they use when they murder their partners applies here. The women are the most guilty because they knew it was bullshit. The men took the women's word as fact and hunted down the person they believed was a rapist.
Depends if they present the facts of the case, that the accusation was a lie, that the women spreading it to create the lynch mob knew this and that this woman acted on information she knew was false, using men who didn't know it was false to enforce her will.
The women are the most guilty because they knew it was bullshit. The men took the women's word as fact and hunted down the person they believed was a rapist.
No, they thought he wolf-whistled at her. Are you seriously trying to justify this lynching, if only to try to exculpate the men involved?
using men who didn't know it was false to enforce her will.
Just out of curiosity: why was it 'her will' that this boy should die? Let me guess, you believe that just like Kim Potter, she 'took the opportunity' to kill a guy?
She was named a long time ago, dummy.
Is it justice to try to punish a woman 70 years after the fact?
Justice? No. Delayed, is denied.
Just? Yes.
No, justice failed when she wasn't in jail by 1960.
But setting the example still matters. Proving how hateful women were still matters.
I'd love for all the race grifters to learn the truth about their "allies" when it comes to lynching. It was nearly always co-ordinated by women, off something a woman stated, using the strength of men to enforce it.
"Women are wonderful" effect. None of them questioned it.
So wait, the murderers were not punished, but that didn't bother you. How typical.
Who do you think will read this and conclude that "women are hateful"?
Ironically, women's vile ranting about not being in control of their actions that they use when they murder their partners applies here. The women are the most guilty because they knew it was bullshit. The men took the women's word as fact and hunted down the person they believed was a rapist.
Depends if they present the facts of the case, that the accusation was a lie, that the women spreading it to create the lynch mob knew this and that this woman acted on information she knew was false, using men who didn't know it was false to enforce her will.
No, they thought he wolf-whistled at her. Are you seriously trying to justify this lynching, if only to try to exculpate the men involved?
Just out of curiosity: why was it 'her will' that this boy should die? Let me guess, you believe that just like Kim Potter, she 'took the opportunity' to kill a guy?
Could you point to where in his comments he says that it did not bother him?