That’s as absurd to me as arguing that anyone who has ever swallowed cum is a cannibal. A fetus just isn’t a person. That’s why you don’t have a fetus. You have a baby.
I'm not sure what to even do with this argument.
Given: The entity before birth is a fetus.
Given: The entity after birth is a baby.
Therefore: A fetus isn't a person.
He missed some critical steps there. Ignoring what he believes the fact that his argument is so poorly formed makes me wonder how he manages to dress himself in the morning. I have more respect for the few abortion supporters that will admit it is a murder but that the murder should be allowed.
He's saying that if A + B = C, then A and B are both C. I think there's actually a specific name for that particular logical fallacy, but I don't know it. You don't see it too often because it's prima facie retarded in just about any context aside from abortion, which has short-circuited so many peoples' brains that they say things that don't make any sense.
I'm not sure what to even do with this argument.
Given: The entity before birth is a fetus.
Given: The entity after birth is a baby.
Therefore: A fetus isn't a person.
He missed some critical steps there. Ignoring what he believes the fact that his argument is so poorly formed makes me wonder how he manages to dress himself in the morning. I have more respect for the few abortion supporters that will admit it is a murder but that the murder should be allowed.
Fun fact: "Fetus" is latin for baby.
I find it odd that pro-infanticide advocates seem to not know anything about how humans grow.
He's saying that if A + B = C, then A and B are both C. I think there's actually a specific name for that particular logical fallacy, but I don't know it. You don't see it too often because it's prima facie retarded in just about any context aside from abortion, which has short-circuited so many peoples' brains that they say things that don't make any sense.