I don't think it's "just fine" to force the black man to act white. I think it is contrary to his nature, and in fact he is worthy of a country to call his own where black standards may be enforced.
"Force" wasn't part of the deal. It's a choice. The way America is/was supposed to work is, you can choose good, and do well, or choose poorly, and fail.
It's the Liberal narrative that choices are actually force, by virtue of choice carrying consequence. They seek to equalize outcomes regardless of good choices and poor ones (through Governmental muscle, aka "force").
If black people had their own country they might establish different rules for what is acceptable that would be easier for them to comply with. For instance, it might be acceptable for the poor to steal from the rich. Maybe cheating on your taxes isn't a crime. There is such a thing as absolute right and wrong, but it doesn't map directly onto laws, or onto the mechanism of crime and punishment.
For another example, in several Asian and Arab countries drug trafficking is punishable by death. Is that right or wrong? IDK, but it may work for them. That sort of self determination is every people's right.
So this is a "blacks are a people" thing, then? Like, Haitians are the same as Nigerians are the same as a dude born and raised in Detroit? If that's the case, I really can't agree. I've had black neighbors who were as American as all get-out...certainly more than some twerpy ear-gauge blue-hair from Seattle.
I support a right to self-determination on this matter. Some, for lack of a better word, African Americans feel they are a people. Some do not identify that way. Some white people identify as white. Some identify another way. I suspect Nigerians do not identify as the same people as African Americans, no.
Jared Taylor proposed a three-way partition of America into white, black, and multicultural. That seems roughly correct.
I don't think it's "just fine" to force the black man to act white. I think it is contrary to his nature, and in fact he is worthy of a country to call his own where black standards may be enforced.
"Force" wasn't part of the deal. It's a choice. The way America is/was supposed to work is, you can choose good, and do well, or choose poorly, and fail.
It's the Liberal narrative that choices are actually force, by virtue of choice carrying consequence. They seek to equalize outcomes regardless of good choices and poor ones (through Governmental muscle, aka "force").
Which is why they hate Christianity. Such is the demonic impetus.
If black people had their own country they might establish different rules for what is acceptable that would be easier for them to comply with. For instance, it might be acceptable for the poor to steal from the rich. Maybe cheating on your taxes isn't a crime. There is such a thing as absolute right and wrong, but it doesn't map directly onto laws, or onto the mechanism of crime and punishment.
For another example, in several Asian and Arab countries drug trafficking is punishable by death. Is that right or wrong? IDK, but it may work for them. That sort of self determination is every people's right.
So this is a "blacks are a people" thing, then? Like, Haitians are the same as Nigerians are the same as a dude born and raised in Detroit? If that's the case, I really can't agree. I've had black neighbors who were as American as all get-out...certainly more than some twerpy ear-gauge blue-hair from Seattle.
I support a right to self-determination on this matter. Some, for lack of a better word, African Americans feel they are a people. Some do not identify that way. Some white people identify as white. Some identify another way. I suspect Nigerians do not identify as the same people as African Americans, no.
Jared Taylor proposed a three-way partition of America into white, black, and multicultural. That seems roughly correct.
Is the nature of white people communist self destructing retardation then🤔
kek, no, I made it up, but IIRC Lincoln was a black nationalist.