Uh no they can't. Canada does not have a 1st amendment, but it does have
=======================================
1 The Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms guarantees the rights and >freedoms set out in it subject only to such reasonable limits prescribed by law as >can be demonstrably justified in a free and democratic society.
Fundamental Freedoms
Marginal note:Fundamental freedoms
2 Everyone has the following fundamental freedoms:
(a) freedom of conscience and religion;
(b) freedom of thought, belief, opinion and expression, including freedom of the press and other media of communication;
freedoms set out in it subject only to such reasonable limits prescribed by law
You quoted the part that makes it completely unlike the 1st amendment or in fact, any amendment in the Bill of Rights. The Government gets to decide what is "reasonable limits". They get to decide what is a "Free and Democratic" society. So when they say "Trucker Convoys are a threat to democracy", now you know why. It's so they can justify to simply ignore the charter.
And it's not 1.2(b), it's 2(b). 1 is the section that makes it so much of the charter is basically toilet paper. 2 is a separate section. Maybe you should learn how to read laws on the Government site before you attempt to cite them at Canadians who know much better than you :
Not to mention section 2 can be revoked at anytime according to section 33, the Notwithstanding clause :
33 (1) Parliament or the legislature of a province may expressly declare in an Act of Parliament or of the legislature, as the case may be, that the Act or a provision thereof shall operate notwithstanding a provision included in section 2 or sections 7 to 15 of this Charter.
Of course it is unlike it - it is from a different country. You are aware of this right?
Seriously, since we are slinging insults here - You are like a liberal that thinks conservatives are just doing liberalism badly, instead of knowing it is something different. If you can't figure this out, I'll wait a few years/decades for you to catch up.
Finally, that clause 33 - merely means that any rights given, or implied in the charter are merely based on nothing - Thus... and I want you to sit down for this little one...
WHO CARES WHAT THEY THINK !!!!
They have no real standing other than the willingness to use force - AND it is about time everyone see's them for that they are and be dealt with.
So no, not uninformed - just tied of waiting for you all to awake.
Of course it is unlike it - it is from a different country. You are aware of this right?
Are you ok ? The point is the 1st amendment is absolute. It is a GOD GIVEN right.
Section 2 of the Canadian charter is not absolute. It is a GOVERNMENT Granted right, which can be revoked or limited by what GOVERNMENT deems free and democratic.
Seriously, since we are slinging insults here -
I'm trying real hard not to be insulting, but you're quite ignorant of the charter, think it protects you, and then argue when shown you have no clue what you're talking about.
Finally, that clause 33 - merely means that any rights given, or implied in the charter are merely based on nothing - Thus... and I want you to sit down for this little one...
No, Section 33, the Notwithstanding clause, can be used at any time to suspend rights in the Charter and passing laws that go against these rights. The Quebec Government literally just used it a few years ago to ban head coverings in contravention to freedom of religion.
So no, not uninformed
But you're completely uninformed. You think the charter is an actual thing. It's toilet paper with multiple loopholes that are intentionally put there so Government can just take away every right you have whenever they feel like it.
It's not even remotely in the same ballpark as the US Bill of Rights. Has nothing to do with the fact it's 2 different countries, it's because one protects your GOD GIVEN rights, the other is a list of Rights the GOVERNMENT might grant you if they feel like it that day.
just tied of waiting for you all to awake.
We're more awake than you are. You think this just started. This has been ongoing for decades. I bet you didn't know that the Canadian military used turrent machine guns on Protesters... back in 1918. Canada has never respected the rights of anyone.
Uh ? Yes they can. Especially in Canada where there's no 1st amendment.
And you'll be back in jail in 2 minutes if you disobey a court order. Have fun fighting that with your lawyer.
Uh no they can't. Canada does not have a 1st amendment, but it does have
=======================================
=======================================
DO you want to read the class Section 1.2(b)???
You quoted the part that makes it completely unlike the 1st amendment or in fact, any amendment in the Bill of Rights. The Government gets to decide what is "reasonable limits". They get to decide what is a "Free and Democratic" society. So when they say "Trucker Convoys are a threat to democracy", now you know why. It's so they can justify to simply ignore the charter.
And it's not 1.2(b), it's 2(b). 1 is the section that makes it so much of the charter is basically toilet paper. 2 is a separate section. Maybe you should learn how to read laws on the Government site before you attempt to cite them at Canadians who know much better than you :
https://laws-lois.justice.gc.ca/eng/const/page-12.html
Not to mention section 2 can be revoked at anytime according to section 33, the Notwithstanding clause :
Seriously. You're a grossly uninformed.
Of course it is unlike it - it is from a different country. You are aware of this right?
Seriously, since we are slinging insults here - You are like a liberal that thinks conservatives are just doing liberalism badly, instead of knowing it is something different. If you can't figure this out, I'll wait a few years/decades for you to catch up.
Finally, that clause 33 - merely means that any rights given, or implied in the charter are merely based on nothing - Thus... and I want you to sit down for this little one...
WHO CARES WHAT THEY THINK !!!!
They have no real standing other than the willingness to use force - AND it is about time everyone see's them for that they are and be dealt with.
So no, not uninformed - just tied of waiting for you all to awake.
Are you ok ? The point is the 1st amendment is absolute. It is a GOD GIVEN right.
Section 2 of the Canadian charter is not absolute. It is a GOVERNMENT Granted right, which can be revoked or limited by what GOVERNMENT deems free and democratic.
I'm trying real hard not to be insulting, but you're quite ignorant of the charter, think it protects you, and then argue when shown you have no clue what you're talking about.
No, Section 33, the Notwithstanding clause, can be used at any time to suspend rights in the Charter and passing laws that go against these rights. The Quebec Government literally just used it a few years ago to ban head coverings in contravention to freedom of religion.
But you're completely uninformed. You think the charter is an actual thing. It's toilet paper with multiple loopholes that are intentionally put there so Government can just take away every right you have whenever they feel like it.
It's not even remotely in the same ballpark as the US Bill of Rights. Has nothing to do with the fact it's 2 different countries, it's because one protects your GOD GIVEN rights, the other is a list of Rights the GOVERNMENT might grant you if they feel like it that day.
We're more awake than you are. You think this just started. This has been ongoing for decades. I bet you didn't know that the Canadian military used turrent machine guns on Protesters... back in 1918. Canada has never respected the rights of anyone.
Uh, yeah? What did you think government is?