Of course it is unlike it - it is from a different country. You are aware of this right?
Are you ok ? The point is the 1st amendment is absolute. It is a GOD GIVEN right.
Section 2 of the Canadian charter is not absolute. It is a GOVERNMENT Granted right, which can be revoked or limited by what GOVERNMENT deems free and democratic.
Seriously, since we are slinging insults here -
I'm trying real hard not to be insulting, but you're quite ignorant of the charter, think it protects you, and then argue when shown you have no clue what you're talking about.
Finally, that clause 33 - merely means that any rights given, or implied in the charter are merely based on nothing - Thus... and I want you to sit down for this little one...
No, Section 33, the Notwithstanding clause, can be used at any time to suspend rights in the Charter and passing laws that go against these rights. The Quebec Government literally just used it a few years ago to ban head coverings in contravention to freedom of religion.
So no, not uninformed
But you're completely uninformed. You think the charter is an actual thing. It's toilet paper with multiple loopholes that are intentionally put there so Government can just take away every right you have whenever they feel like it.
It's not even remotely in the same ballpark as the US Bill of Rights. Has nothing to do with the fact it's 2 different countries, it's because one protects your GOD GIVEN rights, the other is a list of Rights the GOVERNMENT might grant you if they feel like it that day.
just tied of waiting for you all to awake.
We're more awake than you are. You think this just started. This has been ongoing for decades. I bet you didn't know that the Canadian military used turrent machine guns on Protesters... back in 1918. Canada has never respected the rights of anyone.
The point you seem to miss is that every Right is a God given right....Or do you disagree?
The US "right" is no more a right, than any other right that any other human has. All rights are from God, the countries either recognise or ignore them, but what they are, and where they come from is never derived from a parliment. Not in the US, not in Canada, not anywhere. Are you starting to get it kiddo?
The notwithstanding clause in every country(as true in the US and UK as it is in Canada) is an inherent and logical violation of each countries laws. You can't have a set of rules, and one rule states that all other rules are null and void at any time, for some reason - and still have that logically follow as a set of rules. So again - if there is no real rules - WHO CARES..... Clearly you, but why?
I am aware of just about every infringement on citizens in North America since the 80's, and I can tell you that as much of an ass as the Canadian government has been to its citizens - it is a perfect person, compared to what the US government has done to US citizens... right? Waco? Ruby? and, and, and.... AND I clearly don't have to go back a century to find it. Not that the Canadian government is good, or that it cares about its citizens - just that there are A LOT of places worse, including America. So maybe shut your pie hole, and realise you know not of what you speak?
Have a wonderful day, and I will continue to wait for you to awake.
The point you seem to miss is that every Right is a God given right....Or do you disagree?
Not in Canada, not how the Charter works. And they have the guns, the penitentiaries, the judges to make it so you have no rights. They'll have you jailed and you have 0 recourse.
Because the Charter of Rights in Canada ISN'T the Bill of Rights. It protects didly squat.
The US "right" is no more a right, than any other right that any other human has.
No, but the Bill of Rights GARANTEES that the Government can't trample your GOD GIVEN right. The document recognizes that rights are GOD GIVEN. The Charter in Canada does not.
Do you get it yet ? God ain't going to break you out of prison.
The notwithstanding clause in every country(as true in the US and UK as it is in Canada)
There is no notwithstanding clause in the US. The Bill of Rights is absolute and requires a Convention of States to even attempt to change or amend.
Are you even Canadian ?
I am aware of just about every infringement on citizens in North America since the 80's
Yet you don't even understand what the Notwithstanding clause is and you think the US has one. Funny. Seriously dude, no one has rights in Canada because no one has the means to defend any rights at all.
Maybe get your head out of your ass long enough to realise that where I sit right now, in the middle of the most liberal, gun hating, restrictive, anti-gun city in Canada outside of maybe Ottawa - there is at least 3 small armoury's held by people that have had those weapons back, not that long ago, when they were legal. They didn't give them up, because the government lies and can't be trusted. Not sure why you haven't learned that yet, but that is your cross to carry.
Outside of Toronto, within an hour or so it gets even worse for those that think Canadians don't have guns. Clearly you don't know shit about Canada other than what your media tells ya.
No, but the Bill of Rights GARANTEES that the Government can't trample your GOD GIVEN right.
And the laws GARANTEEES(keeping the typo for you) that people can't murder people..... which is why no one gets murder......errr....... WOW you've solved the murder issue. BTW, how did that work out for those people in Ruby Ridge? What about WACO? Good thing that government can't trample those rights.... Right? Sit down.
Yet you don't even understand what the Notwithstanding clause is and you think the US has one.
You must be a bot at this stage. The US has multiple "notwithstanding" clauses in their various state and federal constitution, I think the federal one is called the Supremacy clause.
no one has rights in Canada because no one has the means to defend any rights at all.
ANd you have no rights in the US because you have no means to defend any of them. We all just watched your election get stolen, your patriots put in jail without charges and you sat with your thumb up our ass. So all the guns in the world haven't helped you, haven't allowed you to defend one iota of your country. In fact, Americans(by and large) are in an infinitely worse position than anyone else, in any other country - because they still believe the lie despite all observable reality. Smarten up.
Uh ? Of course they have the guns. You think the RCMP and Police just carry around sticks ?
They have guns.
Maybe get your head out of your ass long enough to realise that where I sit right now, in the middle of the most liberal, gun hating, restrictive, anti-gun city in Canada outside of maybe Ottawa - there is at least 3 small armoury's held by people that have had those weapons back,
And every cop in your city has a gun, and if you go against a court order that says "don't be on social media" they will come to your home, with their guns, to arrest you and bring you back to jail.
And the laws GARANTEEES(keeping the typo for you) that people can't murder people.....
ANd you have no rights in the US because you have no means to defend any of them.
I didn't know you were this retarded and this is me trying not to be insulting.
Look, this is futile.
You were completely wrong about the charter of rights, because you probably never bothered to read it. You were wrong about Tamara's bail conditions, because you probably didn't read those either.
Just accept you were wrong on move on. You have no freedom of speech in Canada. Trudeau Father made sure of it when he wrote the charter the way he wrote it. Because Trudeau Father was the kind of guy to pass Martial law and arrest dissident politicians and journalists over something they weren't involved in or had anything to do with.
Are you ok ? The point is the 1st amendment is absolute. It is a GOD GIVEN right.
Section 2 of the Canadian charter is not absolute. It is a GOVERNMENT Granted right, which can be revoked or limited by what GOVERNMENT deems free and democratic.
I'm trying real hard not to be insulting, but you're quite ignorant of the charter, think it protects you, and then argue when shown you have no clue what you're talking about.
No, Section 33, the Notwithstanding clause, can be used at any time to suspend rights in the Charter and passing laws that go against these rights. The Quebec Government literally just used it a few years ago to ban head coverings in contravention to freedom of religion.
But you're completely uninformed. You think the charter is an actual thing. It's toilet paper with multiple loopholes that are intentionally put there so Government can just take away every right you have whenever they feel like it.
It's not even remotely in the same ballpark as the US Bill of Rights. Has nothing to do with the fact it's 2 different countries, it's because one protects your GOD GIVEN rights, the other is a list of Rights the GOVERNMENT might grant you if they feel like it that day.
We're more awake than you are. You think this just started. This has been ongoing for decades. I bet you didn't know that the Canadian military used turrent machine guns on Protesters... back in 1918. Canada has never respected the rights of anyone.
The point you seem to miss is that every Right is a God given right....Or do you disagree?
The US "right" is no more a right, than any other right that any other human has. All rights are from God, the countries either recognise or ignore them, but what they are, and where they come from is never derived from a parliment. Not in the US, not in Canada, not anywhere. Are you starting to get it kiddo?
The notwithstanding clause in every country(as true in the US and UK as it is in Canada) is an inherent and logical violation of each countries laws. You can't have a set of rules, and one rule states that all other rules are null and void at any time, for some reason - and still have that logically follow as a set of rules. So again - if there is no real rules - WHO CARES..... Clearly you, but why?
I am aware of just about every infringement on citizens in North America since the 80's, and I can tell you that as much of an ass as the Canadian government has been to its citizens - it is a perfect person, compared to what the US government has done to US citizens... right? Waco? Ruby? and, and, and.... AND I clearly don't have to go back a century to find it. Not that the Canadian government is good, or that it cares about its citizens - just that there are A LOT of places worse, including America. So maybe shut your pie hole, and realise you know not of what you speak?
Have a wonderful day, and I will continue to wait for you to awake.
Not in Canada, not how the Charter works. And they have the guns, the penitentiaries, the judges to make it so you have no rights. They'll have you jailed and you have 0 recourse.
Because the Charter of Rights in Canada ISN'T the Bill of Rights. It protects didly squat.
No, but the Bill of Rights GARANTEES that the Government can't trample your GOD GIVEN right. The document recognizes that rights are GOD GIVEN. The Charter in Canada does not.
Do you get it yet ? God ain't going to break you out of prison.
There is no notwithstanding clause in the US. The Bill of Rights is absolute and requires a Convention of States to even attempt to change or amend.
Are you even Canadian ?
Yet you don't even understand what the Notwithstanding clause is and you think the US has one. Funny. Seriously dude, no one has rights in Canada because no one has the means to defend any rights at all.
You do realise they don't have the guns right?
Maybe get your head out of your ass long enough to realise that where I sit right now, in the middle of the most liberal, gun hating, restrictive, anti-gun city in Canada outside of maybe Ottawa - there is at least 3 small armoury's held by people that have had those weapons back, not that long ago, when they were legal. They didn't give them up, because the government lies and can't be trusted. Not sure why you haven't learned that yet, but that is your cross to carry.
Outside of Toronto, within an hour or so it gets even worse for those that think Canadians don't have guns. Clearly you don't know shit about Canada other than what your media tells ya.
Uh ? Of course they have the guns. You think the RCMP and Police just carry around sticks ?
They have guns.
And every cop in your city has a gun, and if you go against a court order that says "don't be on social media" they will come to your home, with their guns, to arrest you and bring you back to jail.
I didn't know you were this retarded and this is me trying not to be insulting.
Look, this is futile.
You were completely wrong about the charter of rights, because you probably never bothered to read it. You were wrong about Tamara's bail conditions, because you probably didn't read those either.
Just accept you were wrong on move on. You have no freedom of speech in Canada. Trudeau Father made sure of it when he wrote the charter the way he wrote it. Because Trudeau Father was the kind of guy to pass Martial law and arrest dissident politicians and journalists over something they weren't involved in or had anything to do with.