Aside: you're getting mad at criticism of troonery yet again.
More like rightly pointing out that troonery is a direct product of radical feminism. They are responsible for driving so many men into this insanity through their relentless denigration and demonisation of men and masculinity. Siding with them when they turn around complain about the troons invading their spaces effectively just amounts to right-wing simping.
Megan Murphy hates you because you are male. She and her ilk are primarily responsible, not only for the crisis of masculinity that has generated the transgender phenomenon in the first place, but also for the regime of state-sponsored censorship and criminalisation of speech that is now being used against them. They do not deserve our sympathy.
More like rightly pointing out that troonery is a direct product of radical feminism.
The funniest thing is that he persuaded himself that "feminists are against troonerey", so he holds the opposite view - requiring him to ignore that nearly all feminists are 100% on board with it.
They are responsible for driving so many men into this insanity through their relentless denigration and demonisation of men and masculinity.
They are responsible for it because of the nonsense they preach, like gender theory. Not this. Because more and more women are trying to be pathetic shadows of men now.
Megan Murphy hates you because you are male.
Even if she does, I don't care. I only care if she is useful, and she is.
There's been far too much simping in nominally right-wing spaces to the Terfs, just because they've been on the receiving end of the pro-troon censorship regime. Suddenly, men in conservative spaces are bending over backwards to show how willing they are to defend women from the big bad trannies. When you do that, you're playing right into the hands of man-hating swamp scum like Megan Murphy, who will turn on you as soon as she gets what she wants from you, and use the right's own rhetoric about "protecting women's spaces" as a stick to beat yet another generation of young men into submission and alienation.
I said this yesterday in a different thread, and I'll repeat it here. However toxic and destructive some of the troons' behaviour is, the overwhelming majority of them are just a bunch of broken men. Our anger should be reserved for the forces that broke them.
She's not doing he activism for the good of you or me, obviously. But there still can be a symbiotic relationship, and there is.
When you do that, you're playing right into the hands of man-hating swamp scum like Megan Murphy, who will turn on you as soon as she gets what she wants from you, and use the right's own rhetoric about "protecting women's spaces" as a stick to beat yet another generation of young men into submission and alienation.
How exactly?
And even if she does, you need to be able to distinguish between major threats and minor threats. So what if she continues defending women's spaces? Who cares?
However toxic and destructive some of the troons' behaviour is, the overwhelming majority of them are just a bunch of broken men. Our anger should be reserved for the forces that broke them.
That's like saying that you shouldn't be angry at rabid dogs, but at the rabies virus.
She wouldn't call herself a right-winger either.
But doesn't mean she cannot be useful.
Aside: you're getting mad at criticism of troonery yet again.
More like rightly pointing out that troonery is a direct product of radical feminism. They are responsible for driving so many men into this insanity through their relentless denigration and demonisation of men and masculinity. Siding with them when they turn around complain about the troons invading their spaces effectively just amounts to right-wing simping.
Megan Murphy hates you because you are male. She and her ilk are primarily responsible, not only for the crisis of masculinity that has generated the transgender phenomenon in the first place, but also for the regime of state-sponsored censorship and criminalisation of speech that is now being used against them. They do not deserve our sympathy.
The funniest thing is that he persuaded himself that "feminists are against troonerey", so he holds the opposite view - requiring him to ignore that nearly all feminists are 100% on board with it.
They are responsible for it because of the nonsense they preach, like gender theory. Not this. Because more and more women are trying to be pathetic shadows of men now.
Even if she does, I don't care. I only care if she is useful, and she is.
I would argue that she is using you.
There's been far too much simping in nominally right-wing spaces to the Terfs, just because they've been on the receiving end of the pro-troon censorship regime. Suddenly, men in conservative spaces are bending over backwards to show how willing they are to defend women from the big bad trannies. When you do that, you're playing right into the hands of man-hating swamp scum like Megan Murphy, who will turn on you as soon as she gets what she wants from you, and use the right's own rhetoric about "protecting women's spaces" as a stick to beat yet another generation of young men into submission and alienation.
I said this yesterday in a different thread, and I'll repeat it here. However toxic and destructive some of the troons' behaviour is, the overwhelming majority of them are just a bunch of broken men. Our anger should be reserved for the forces that broke them.
She's not doing he activism for the good of you or me, obviously. But there still can be a symbiotic relationship, and there is.
How exactly?
And even if she does, you need to be able to distinguish between major threats and minor threats. So what if she continues defending women's spaces? Who cares?
That's like saying that you shouldn't be angry at rabid dogs, but at the rabies virus.