Anyone want to explain why we shouldn't violently defend children from the evils this pedophile cult wants to inflict on minors?
“Nobody was ‘cis.’ They didn’t like that term. Being ‘cis’ is tantamount to being basic and none of them wanted to be that. That was my first inkling that something wasn’t right.”
More to the point being "cis" is tantamount to being subhuman in these circles. Troons use "cis" the same way Klansmen use "nigger".
That about sums it up. I will say that when it's your own flesh and blood you gotta do what you gotta do regardless of the consequences. That's just being a man and not a pussy.
I'm not. If you read my comment, you'll understand my suspicion. The article exonerated the biologically female groomers in favor of the same tired logic feminists always give - everything is men's fault for existing.
Anyone want to explain why we shouldn't violently defend children from the evils this pedophile cult wants to inflict on minors?
More to the point being "cis" is tantamount to being subhuman in these circles. Troons use "cis" the same way Klansmen use "nigger".
No good reasons, only legal ones.
That about sums it up. I will say that when it's your own flesh and blood you gotta do what you gotta do regardless of the consequences. That's just being a man and not a pussy.
cept klansmen had a point
Yeah, the 19th was absolutely fucking visionary.
Because this article is more obviously false than Amber Heard's abuse claims, with a very questionable source that has unknown funding.
Call me when you get to the feminists though.
I'm shocked that a rape apologist would also simp for child sex grooming.
I'm not. If you read my comment, you'll understand my suspicion. The article exonerated the biologically female groomers in favor of the same tired logic feminists always give - everything is men's fault for existing.