26 () posted 2 years ago by folx 2 years ago by folx +26 / -0 35 comments share 35 comments share save hide report block hide replies
So... Don't pay for product or service?
Charitable interpretation : They would aim at paying "equitable" salaries to the workers rather than pumping as much cash as possible to the owner.
Less braindead consideration : exchanging services and goods for money is capitalism, so what are they smoking.
Well, ideally, the store would be a co-op, where everyone shares the wealth. Maybe even the customers can join for a modest fee (see: Alberta Co-Op stores, and UFA.)
The downside is, everyone also shares in costs and failure as well.
Commie: I hate capitalism! I'm going to start a co-op where the employees share ownership.
Capitalism: Okay then, that was always allowed.
The only thing stopping these people is time, effort, and skill.
So in essence everything.