Almost as if degeneracy is a mental and spiritual disorder that shouldn't be tolerated at all, even in "it's own place."
IMO it is a part of human nature that needs to be managed. We would also be better off if the people with the bottom 10% iq didn't exist but that would just create another bottom 10% to deal with.
And while I agree it is a mental illness there is a difference between a person who is sane enough to reasonably mask his deficiencies while in public and those who can't.
70 years ago we had all sorts of social sanctions against degeneracy. Including PSAs warning kids about the dangers of homosexuals. They couldn't serve in the military, they wouldn't be hired for any public-facing job or working with kids. And mainly property and business owners could choose not to associate with known or even suspected degenerates without any legal sanction.
That seems like a reasonable balance. No need to "root them out" if they don't make themselves impossible to ignore.
I agree with you, but a society that thinks fags can "have their own place" or "what adults do in private is their own business" is not a society that will shame an open fag into losing his social standing and economic prospects.
It can be an unspoken agreement that as long as the governor has a beard, no one says anything. But the spoken rhetoric has to be one of zero tolerance. Anything less is a concession.
IMO it is a part of human nature that needs to be managed. We would also be better off if the people with the bottom 10% iq didn't exist but that would just create another bottom 10% to deal with.
And while I agree it is a mental illness there is a difference between a person who is sane enough to reasonably mask his deficiencies while in public and those who can't.
70 years ago we had all sorts of social sanctions against degeneracy. Including PSAs warning kids about the dangers of homosexuals. They couldn't serve in the military, they wouldn't be hired for any public-facing job or working with kids. And mainly property and business owners could choose not to associate with known or even suspected degenerates without any legal sanction.
That seems like a reasonable balance. No need to "root them out" if they don't make themselves impossible to ignore.
I agree with you, but a society that thinks fags can "have their own place" or "what adults do in private is their own business" is not a society that will shame an open fag into losing his social standing and economic prospects.
It can be an unspoken agreement that as long as the governor has a beard, no one says anything. But the spoken rhetoric has to be one of zero tolerance. Anything less is a concession.