I see, so having acknowledged acts of aggression by the US government that, among many others, may have contributed to provoking the Russians into armed conflict in Ukraine to begin with, you stand by your posts advocating censorship of the only sources of information that might make the American public aware of the role their own government has played in causing this conflict to begin with.
Why? Because that might make Americans less likely to want to participate in this conflict? I'd call that a good thing.
Once again, your argument seems to be that people should only be allowed to receive information about the Ukraine conflict from institutional sources and sources on the pro-NATO side of the argument.
The only reason you could possibly want that is to prevent people from gaining as clear and comprehensive a portrait as possible of what is actually going on, in an effort to prejudice them against Russia and in favour of military action against Russia.
Your efforts to make this debate about anything other than your own pro-censorship position amount to nothing but gaslighting.
I see, so having acknowledged acts of aggression by the US government that, among many others, may have contributed to provoking the Russians into armed conflict in Ukraine to begin with, you stand by your posts advocating censorship of the only sources of information that might make the American public aware of the role their own government has played in causing this conflict to begin with.
Why? Because that might make Americans less likely to want to participate in this conflict? I'd call that a good thing.
https://www.nytimes.com/2022/05/04/us/politics/russia-generals-killed-ukraine.html
Don't project your personal ignorance please.
Once again, your argument seems to be that people should only be allowed to receive information about the Ukraine conflict from institutional sources and sources on the pro-NATO side of the argument.
The only reason you could possibly want that is to prevent people from gaining as clear and comprehensive a portrait as possible of what is actually going on, in an effort to prejudice them against Russia and in favour of military action against Russia.
Your efforts to make this debate about anything other than your own pro-censorship position amount to nothing but gaslighting.
No, my argument is for Russia to use their own servers. They can cyberattack yet can't host videos? Boohoo.
No, acts of war in defense. And as I said, they're bragging about it.