Once again, your argument seems to be that people should only be allowed to receive information about the Ukraine conflict from institutional sources and sources on the pro-NATO side of the argument.
The only reason you could possibly want that is to prevent people from gaining as clear and comprehensive a portrait as possible of what is actually going on, in an effort to prejudice them against Russia and in favour of military action against Russia.
Your efforts to make this debate about anything other than your own pro-censorship position amount to nothing but gaslighting.
https://www.nytimes.com/2022/05/04/us/politics/russia-generals-killed-ukraine.html
Don't project your personal ignorance please.
Once again, your argument seems to be that people should only be allowed to receive information about the Ukraine conflict from institutional sources and sources on the pro-NATO side of the argument.
The only reason you could possibly want that is to prevent people from gaining as clear and comprehensive a portrait as possible of what is actually going on, in an effort to prejudice them against Russia and in favour of military action against Russia.
Your efforts to make this debate about anything other than your own pro-censorship position amount to nothing but gaslighting.
No, my argument is for Russia to use their own servers. They can cyberattack yet can't host videos? Boohoo.