And I want it to stay that way. Your point was that we shouldn't be sharing information from pro-Russian sources, even if it's often more truthful than the "ghost of Kiev" type propaganda being spewed by our own leaders, because we're at war. We'll my country is not at war with Russia or Ukraine, so get fucked with your efforts to censor information that goes against the establishment narrative.
Yes, only American intel planes locate the Russian generals for them to be killed with the American supplied weapons, and then America brags about it. Not a war at all. Also just a special military operation.
After all the war to end all wars has ended over 100 years ago.
I see, so having acknowledged acts of aggression by the US government that, among many others, may have contributed to provoking the Russians into armed conflict in Ukraine to begin with, you stand by your posts advocating censorship of the only sources of information that might make the American public aware of the role their own government has played in causing this conflict to begin with.
Why? Because that might make Americans less likely to want to participate in this conflict? I'd call that a good thing.
And I want it to stay that way. Your point was that we shouldn't be sharing information from pro-Russian sources, even if it's often more truthful than the "ghost of Kiev" type propaganda being spewed by our own leaders, because we're at war. We'll my country is not at war with Russia or Ukraine, so get fucked with your efforts to censor information that goes against the establishment narrative.
Your country, but YT is an American company.
The US is also not at war with Russia.
Yes, only American intel planes locate the Russian generals for them to be killed with the American supplied weapons, and then America brags about it. Not a war at all. Also just a special military operation.
After all the war to end all wars has ended over 100 years ago.
I see, so having acknowledged acts of aggression by the US government that, among many others, may have contributed to provoking the Russians into armed conflict in Ukraine to begin with, you stand by your posts advocating censorship of the only sources of information that might make the American public aware of the role their own government has played in causing this conflict to begin with.
Why? Because that might make Americans less likely to want to participate in this conflict? I'd call that a good thing.