Okay, so this one looks standard and also while I have no idea how a piano works it probably makes no sense as a booby trap to be there to begin with. Even if it does make sense somehow it's still needlessly convuloted.
I saw the inside of a piano in a Tom and Jerry cartoon once when I was like 8, but I see you're an expert on the subject of pianos so good for you.
I referred to the the title "The VOG-25P cannot detonate without being fired from a grenade launcher. It is drop safe to 3 m, and has an arming distance of 10-40m." which had nothing about pianos but only false assertions about grenades. You can turn any small munition into a hand grenade or a booby trap and it's not even hard if you just have basic parts.
But it looks placed sideways, so shit makes no sense even if it's just a placeholder safe grenade for a photo. Also I don't think anyone would be going around making such cartoonish contraptions even out of boredom, it's just absurd.
VOG-25's are caseless, you inbred downie. If you actually read what I linked in my first comment you would know that by now.
Here let me help you:
In the VOG-25 shot, the chamber for the propellant powder charge was located directly on the grenade. As a result, there was no need for such an operation as extraction of a spent cartridge case. After the shot, the shooter should only take out another grenade from the bag, insert it into the muzzle of the grenade launcher and push it until it stops in the barrel.
Linking to some Fudd on Gunbroker is top tier retardation. "I know what I got!"
Did you forget they were not inside a gun but in a piano? And that it has an actual casing on the outside? DId you see the pictures? Or is it like the citations you gave me about Jews, which I saved them? :D
They used a file photo.
No, scroll up to the photo of the piano- looks identical to your "file photo"
At least one person looked at the article.
Okay, so this one looks standard and also while I have no idea how a piano works it probably makes no sense as a booby trap to be there to begin with. Even if it does make sense somehow it's still needlessly convuloted.
Was that really so hard, just reading the damn article?
kek. this is really the state of zelenskis fanbois.
6 comments down you admit that you have no idea what the orientation was nor the specifics of this article. NICE zelenskifanbois in disarray
I saw the inside of a piano in a Tom and Jerry cartoon once when I was like 8, but I see you're an expert on the subject of pianos so good for you.
I referred to the the title "The VOG-25P cannot detonate without being fired from a grenade launcher. It is drop safe to 3 m, and has an arming distance of 10-40m." which had nothing about pianos but only false assertions about grenades. You can turn any small munition into a hand grenade or a booby trap and it's not even hard if you just have basic parts.
All it's going to do there is jam the hammers, I'm pretty sure. If you want that grenade to go off you have to hit the pointy end really hard.
But it looks placed sideways, so shit makes no sense even if it's just a placeholder safe grenade for a photo. Also I don't think anyone would be going around making such cartoonish contraptions even out of boredom, it's just absurd.
It also seems to be missing the casing. Suggesting modification.
https://bulcomersks.com/military-products/ammunition/under-barrel-revolver-grenade-ammunitions/40mm-round-arfg-25p-vog-25p/
cut away to show the casing missing
https://www.gunbroker.com/item/921327102
VOG-25's are caseless, you inbred downie. If you actually read what I linked in my first comment you would know that by now.
Here let me help you:
Linking to some Fudd on Gunbroker is top tier retardation. "I know what I got!"
Did you forget they were not inside a gun but in a piano? And that it has an actual casing on the outside? DId you see the pictures? Or is it like the citations you gave me about Jews, which I saved them? :D
https://i.imgur.com/li2wPj8.png
it looks like a 25 nonP case. so the article might also be wrong.
Comment Reported for: Rule 12 - Falsehoods
Comment Approved: This is more about 'being wrong' rather than intentionally trying to spread fake information that he knows is false.