Ryan Dawson would be my go-to though. I put him at the top for a reason.
/edit
If you really want to start understanding "What is going on" you need to go much further back. I would generally recommend "The Creature at Jekyll Island" by G. Edward Griffin, "The Progressive Era" by Rothbard & Newman, and "The Managerial Revolution" by James Burnham.
I never said I wholly believe the official story, but believing the 9/11 conspiracy theories requires willfully ignoring a lot of easily seen evidence.
Now it's been almost twenty years since I've seen Loose Change, but I'll tell you about my experience watching it.
It started out interesting, and cited some news articles, which if true, were very concerning. Then it devolved into citing Wikipedia, and finally "Random Internet Guy on forum says he saw the passengers from Flight 11 being unloaded at the airport under armed guard!" and other completely unverifiable claims.
Still, if any of this was true, it was concerning, and it led me to do my own internet searching for more information.
One of the first things I found was a news article from which LC took a quote from the coroner on the site of the Flight 93. The coroner said they hadn't found any bodies, and LC used that as evidence that F93 was actually remote controlled and unmanned.
However, the next paragraph in the article went on to describe how it was hours later that they finally started finding human remains, because they had been blown to shreds and scattered over a wide area by the impact.
The LC makers chose to ignore that part of the article to instead push their narrative. That is flat out lying, and that made me really start looking into their claims.
I also found an article from a couple years later, interviewing the same coroner in which he detailed the painstaking and gruesome work he and a handful of assistants had done for two or three years to catalog and DNA test every scrap of tissue and fragment of bone so that they could return the remains to the families of the victims.
I realize from your sarcastic tone, that you regard me as one of the sheeple who believe whatever CNN tells me, so I'm not going to waste much more time providing you with facts that can easily be verified. However, I'll point out the following:
No, the Pentagon was not struck by a missile. You can easily find pictures of the streetlights that were knocked over by the wingspan of the 757 that hit them. You can find pictures of the fuselage fragments other parts that still bear the AA markings.
No, WTC 7 didn't just magically implode. You can find pictures of the gaping hole torn in one corner from the debris from the collapsing towers. You can find video of smoke pouring out from the lower floors.
No, the WTCs did not free fall. There are multiple videos from multiple sources that you can use to time its collapse, and compare that to its height and you will see it's not even close to free fall.
No, the towers did not fall due to controlled demolition. Controlled demolition requires months of preparation, breaking away concrete supports until the building is barely standing on its own. It requires miles of wiring to control the explosives that must detonate with millisecond timing. Wireless is not used, because any interference could screw the whole thing up.
The idea that this happened in two of the largest, busiest buildings in the world, in one of the busiest cites, and nobody fucking noticed is beyond belief.
Plus, it didn't even look like a controlled demolition. Imploded buildings collapse into their own footprint. The towers' tops started falling, and the sides peeled away like a banana.
All this information is out there, but if you're only looking for conspiracies, that all you're going to find.
You clearly spent the time to read everything I said, and this is a very reasonable response, and you are a sane and stable genius who is clearly seeking truth at the expense of ego, and not at all just a foaming-at-the-mouth idiot.
Btw, what are your top 5 pieces of evidence supporting the official story?
Excellent use of sarcasm in a misdirection attempt, but nobody's biting. It's possible to oppose a poorly-constructed argument without adopting the contrapositive. Absence of evidence is not evidence of absence.
Stuff like Zeitgeist and Loose Change were fascinating when I was very young, but I would urge you to watch the Ryan Dawson link I included over any others.
Not to think that they would do it (as politicians are so beneath contempt that they definitely would), even if they were able to pull something like that off, but that they would get away with it.
I have yet to hear an intelligent WTC conspiracy theory that is even remotely plausible. Military airplanes going into it? A missle hitting the Pentagon? The passengers being flown to bases to be executed? C'mon man.
I don't care about any official "story", I just know that the "steel beams don't melt" are BS. And that it's very unlikely for the reason specified earlier.
Not sure whether you're the arbiter of anything resembling the truth when you flippantly called months of documented dodgy aspects of the vaccine propaganda "unsubstantiated [opinions]".
You have a lot of hubris lecturing anyone about "insanity".
Nowhere does that comment say there were no dodgy aspects of vaccine propaganda, only that one loon who claimed that Pence could make Trump president who was so obsessed with hating on vaccines that he called T "the orange buffoon".
So you're just lying. And yes, even your own comment now demonstrates that I am a superior arbiter of truth than you.
What lie? Again, waiting for you to substantiate any of your verbal diarrhea.
Such rage-filled nonsense.
Here's the lie: show me where I asserted that there was no dodgy aspect of vaccine agitprop.
No need -- you were already shown direct links where you're provably full of shit, and you just deflect.
No, I was already shown links where I was correct, and which you attempted to deflect by falsely asserting that I said that there were no dodgy aspects to vaccine agitprop.
"Objective" meaning what AOV approves of, of course.
And which he can demonstrate. But stay in your echo-chamber where vaccines don't even do the elderly any good.
You've been shown plenty, ignore it (again and again and again), go to emotional appeal, and waste everyone's time by deflecting or parroting the reverse. Anything, really, that gets you scot free from answering fuck all.
I'm done with you, go to Imp, maybe he can indulge you in whatever ridiculous conversations you two have.
I'm not aware of any 9/11 documentary that has been successfully scrubbed from existence no matter how outside of the mainstream it is.
Here's Ryan Dawson:
https://www.bitchute.com/video/DfWlEAbmARe8/
Here's Alex Jones:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fkTCQjWOOgo
Here's Loose Change:
https://loosechange911.com/
Here's Zeitgiest:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BaIcXwhHgZI&t=866s
Ryan Dawson would be my go-to though. I put him at the top for a reason.
/edit
If you really want to start understanding "What is going on" you need to go much further back. I would generally recommend "The Creature at Jekyll Island" by G. Edward Griffin, "The Progressive Era" by Rothbard & Newman, and "The Managerial Revolution" by James Burnham.
Loose Change was the "documentary" that made me realize 9/11 truthers were full of shit, and made me critical of conspiracy theorists in general.
It is specious garbage.
I never said I wholly believe the official story, but believing the 9/11 conspiracy theories requires willfully ignoring a lot of easily seen evidence.
Now it's been almost twenty years since I've seen Loose Change, but I'll tell you about my experience watching it.
It started out interesting, and cited some news articles, which if true, were very concerning. Then it devolved into citing Wikipedia, and finally "Random Internet Guy on forum says he saw the passengers from Flight 11 being unloaded at the airport under armed guard!" and other completely unverifiable claims.
Still, if any of this was true, it was concerning, and it led me to do my own internet searching for more information.
One of the first things I found was a news article from which LC took a quote from the coroner on the site of the Flight 93. The coroner said they hadn't found any bodies, and LC used that as evidence that F93 was actually remote controlled and unmanned.
However, the next paragraph in the article went on to describe how it was hours later that they finally started finding human remains, because they had been blown to shreds and scattered over a wide area by the impact.
The LC makers chose to ignore that part of the article to instead push their narrative. That is flat out lying, and that made me really start looking into their claims.
I also found an article from a couple years later, interviewing the same coroner in which he detailed the painstaking and gruesome work he and a handful of assistants had done for two or three years to catalog and DNA test every scrap of tissue and fragment of bone so that they could return the remains to the families of the victims.
I realize from your sarcastic tone, that you regard me as one of the sheeple who believe whatever CNN tells me, so I'm not going to waste much more time providing you with facts that can easily be verified. However, I'll point out the following:
No, the Pentagon was not struck by a missile. You can easily find pictures of the streetlights that were knocked over by the wingspan of the 757 that hit them. You can find pictures of the fuselage fragments other parts that still bear the AA markings.
No, WTC 7 didn't just magically implode. You can find pictures of the gaping hole torn in one corner from the debris from the collapsing towers. You can find video of smoke pouring out from the lower floors.
No, the WTCs did not free fall. There are multiple videos from multiple sources that you can use to time its collapse, and compare that to its height and you will see it's not even close to free fall.
No, the towers did not fall due to controlled demolition. Controlled demolition requires months of preparation, breaking away concrete supports until the building is barely standing on its own. It requires miles of wiring to control the explosives that must detonate with millisecond timing. Wireless is not used, because any interference could screw the whole thing up.
The idea that this happened in two of the largest, busiest buildings in the world, in one of the busiest cites, and nobody fucking noticed is beyond belief.
Plus, it didn't even look like a controlled demolition. Imploded buildings collapse into their own footprint. The towers' tops started falling, and the sides peeled away like a banana.
All this information is out there, but if you're only looking for conspiracies, that all you're going to find.
You clearly spent the time to read everything I said, and this is a very reasonable response, and you are a sane and stable genius who is clearly seeking truth at the expense of ego, and not at all just a foaming-at-the-mouth idiot.
I submit to your superior intellect.
Excellent use of sarcasm in a misdirection attempt, but nobody's biting. It's possible to oppose a poorly-constructed argument without adopting the contrapositive. Absence of evidence is not evidence of absence.
Stuff like Zeitgeist and Loose Change were fascinating when I was very young, but I would urge you to watch the Ryan Dawson link I included over any others.
The pentagon part is the most suspicious out of everything. I haven't seen too much but this video goes over a lot of good areas.
You probably had a day off. It's very easy to misremember things.
Not sure why you would think insane conspiracy theories would be closer to the truth.
Not to think that they would do it (as politicians are so beneath contempt that they definitely would), even if they were able to pull something like that off, but that they would get away with it.
I have yet to hear an intelligent WTC conspiracy theory that is even remotely plausible. Military airplanes going into it? A missle hitting the Pentagon? The passengers being flown to bases to be executed? C'mon man.
I don't care about any official "story", I just know that the "steel beams don't melt" are BS. And that it's very unlikely for the reason specified earlier.
Not sure whether you're the arbiter of anything resembling the truth when you flippantly called months of documented dodgy aspects of the vaccine propaganda "unsubstantiated [opinions]".
You have a lot of hubris lecturing anyone about "insanity".
Nowhere does that comment say there were no dodgy aspects of vaccine propaganda, only that one loon who claimed that Pence could make Trump president who was so obsessed with hating on vaccines that he called T "the orange buffoon".
So you're just lying. And yes, even your own comment now demonstrates that I am a superior arbiter of truth than you.
Still waiting on you to substantiate your claim of "unsubstantiated" vax opinions.
Trump ran Operation Warp Speed, and some people aren't happy with it for a number of reasons. I see nothing surprising or wrong about that at all.
Also, this:
Fuck you.
Ah yes, let's ignore your whopper of a lie, and troll a la Reddit for SOURCES.
How about you show me where I said that there was no dodgy aspect of vaccine agitprop? Thanks.
Yes, because they are insane and obsessed. Availability of the vaccines is an objective good.
So well-informed.
What lie? Again, waiting for you to substantiate any of your verbal diarrhea.
No need -- you were already shown direct links where you're provably full of shit, and you just deflect.
"Objective" meaning what AOV approves of, of course. As past threads here, and many sources including Epoch Times show, that's extremely debatable.
Such rage-filled nonsense.
Here's the lie: show me where I asserted that there was no dodgy aspect of vaccine agitprop.
No, I was already shown links where I was correct, and which you attempted to deflect by falsely asserting that I said that there were no dodgy aspects to vaccine agitprop.
And which he can demonstrate. But stay in your echo-chamber where vaccines don't even do the elderly any good.
You've been shown plenty, ignore it (again and again and again), go to emotional appeal, and waste everyone's time by deflecting or parroting the reverse. Anything, really, that gets you scot free from answering fuck all.
I'm done with you, go to Imp, maybe he can indulge you in whatever ridiculous conversations you two have.