Yes, exactly. Their ideology specifies such a utopian ending that any evils they need to commit now are justified by the Glorious Future that they are ushering in.
I'm not sure of any way you could think like this and not become an utterly immoral person.
If you're of this ideology and you realise that you can hurry things along by kicking puppies, then you've got two options:
Go and kick as many puppies as you can find - because this results in the Glorious Future, it's perfectly acceptable
Don't kick puppies. Your moment of squeamishness here delays the Glorious Future and that is - if you're a fully-paid-up cult member - significantly worse than any amount of puppy-kicking you might have done.
I'm looking at the replies to this thread; Twittet is such a shithole.
Somebody posted a pic along the lines of "Everyone posting stop Asian hate...nobody posting stop all hate", and twitter flagged it as potentially unsafe.
In the same thread there are actual calls for violence against a specified target, an actual crime.
I'm surprised they didn't censor Andy Ngo's comment due to harassment of his harassers. That's usually their playbook.
I don't think the calls to violence are actually a crime unless it's a credible threat or actual incitement, but it's certainly well over Twitter's red line in the terms of service.
Just remember the number of interracial hate crimes against White people is both nominally and statistically higher than anti-Asian assaults. We also know most anti-Asian attacks are committed by niggers, same perpetrators as the overwhelming majority of anti-White attacks
No, they definitely do think they're the good guys. The problem is that conservatives go out of their way to give them cover by agreeing with the premise that "violence against your political opponents is okay."
Look at the replies in the original thread. "You should have violently assaulted the small, gay, Asian man!"
I honestly can't comprehend how people can think this is okay still believe they're the good guys. To them, their ends justify any means.
Cause they genuinely don't give a fuck about minorities who don't vote progressive. Same hatred against black people who don't "vote the correct side"
Obligatory Biden: "...then you ain't black!"
Yes, exactly. Their ideology specifies such a utopian ending that any evils they need to commit now are justified by the Glorious Future that they are ushering in.
I'm not sure of any way you could think like this and not become an utterly immoral person.
If you're of this ideology and you realise that you can hurry things along by kicking puppies, then you've got two options:
That's why these people are awful people.
I'm looking at the replies to this thread; Twittet is such a shithole.
Somebody posted a pic along the lines of "Everyone posting stop Asian hate...nobody posting stop all hate", and twitter flagged it as potentially unsafe.
In the same thread there are actual calls for violence against a specified target, an actual crime.
WTF?
I'm surprised they didn't censor Andy Ngo's comment due to harassment of his harassers. That's usually their playbook.
I don't think the calls to violence are actually a crime unless it's a credible threat or actual incitement, but it's certainly well over Twitter's red line in the terms of service.
Just remember the number of interracial hate crimes against White people is both nominally and statistically higher than anti-Asian assaults. We also know most anti-Asian attacks are committed by niggers, same perpetrators as the overwhelming majority of anti-White attacks
They don't think they're the good guys. They're evil and they revel in it. They delight in their depravity.
No, they definitely do think they're the good guys. The problem is that conservatives go out of their way to give them cover by agreeing with the premise that "violence against your political opponents is okay."
I don't think the rhetoric they spew is what they actually think.