the risks of any mistake greatly outweigh any benefits*
*In America
This is a terrible idea*
*In America
In China, Ukraine, or wherever they think they can get away with it, they'll continue their mad science. Can't create man-made horrors beyond human comprehension in your own country? Outsource it to one that will and has 0 concern for moral or ethical implications.
I think the key point to remember here is that your enemy intends to attack you and will do so regardless of your actions. I see no moral failure in striking down someone who is acting in an effort to harm me and my loved ones.
The elites obviously want to do this but they likely won't ever admit it openly.
The scientist in the article Redwood claims that this technology won't be used on humans but I don't buy it.
Even if this technology is only used on animals, the risks of any mistake greatly outweigh any benefits.
This is a terrible idea.
Scientists these days are becoming psychotic.
Isn't one of the proposed reasons Covid happened something about a mutation of an existing animal disease ... ?
Real life's shit's straight out of a Bond film.
That's because you missed the subtext:
*In America
*In America
*In America
In China, Ukraine, or wherever they think they can get away with it, they'll continue their mad science. Can't create man-made horrors beyond human comprehension in your own country? Outsource it to one that will and has 0 concern for moral or ethical implications.
No, the correct response to such an attack is to kill the people attacking you.
There is an interesting avenue of moral philosophy to pursue.
If the only possible means of self-defense is a pre-emptive strike, do you have the moral standing to attack first?
I suppose there has been a similar line of inquiry during the MAD days, but even those would be more akin to simultaneous attacks than pre-emptive.
I think the key point to remember here is that your enemy intends to attack you and will do so regardless of your actions. I see no moral failure in striking down someone who is acting in an effort to harm me and my loved ones.
The scary part is when you apply that line of reasoning to percieved, imagined, or otherwise invented threats.
"Of course the Conservatives are going to murder gays and rape women! That's why we need to kill them now!"
Just food for thought.