Telegraph: https://archive.ph/FGnJX ZeroHedge: https://archive.ph/sTt0n BBC: https://archive.ph/D5NwK
he will make a "substantial donation" to Ms Guiffre's charity in support of victims' rights
They filed to dismiss the case within 30 days.
Telegraph: https://archive.ph/FGnJX ZeroHedge: https://archive.ph/sTt0n BBC: https://archive.ph/D5NwK
he will make a "substantial donation" to Ms Guiffre's charity in support of victims' rights
They filed to dismiss the case within 30 days.
Can't say I'm surprised, but I am still a little bit disappointed.
Pedos should be shot and victims accepting money as well.
It wasn't about money though.
Another woman's racket. I told you all this. 17 means nothing. He paid her off so she'd stop smearing him as a pedophile every time she opened her mouth.
Um, I thought she was under 16.
She was 17 when she met Andrew.
The whole thing was just a farce so another women's "charity" can launder money God only knows where.
No, only 17. The mansion incident occurred in April 2001, four months before Giuffre's 18th birthday.
So, this language of "child sex abuse" and "pedophilia" is pretty ridiculous. The age of consent is 18 in NY, so it was illegal, but it's 16 in many states, so clearly opinions differ.
Ok, then the only thing that may stick is trafficking then.
If you offer more than they might get in an actual court settlement, then they have to accept the offer under law
What? That's idiotic. So idiotic I don't think I can believe you without proof.
google it, next time you dilating