It's literally in the bill with the misogyny laws.
Show me where it says that 'mentioning myocarditis' will get you jail time. Thanks.
I actually have a better argument against the existence of misogyny. New Zealand legalized sex-selective abortion.
Sex-selective abortions are legal everywhere abortion is, as far as I know.
Now, does that sound like a move made by a group that fears being killed for something they can't control, or a move made by a dominant group to cement their status as the majority?
Okay, mentioning that it is neither rare nor mild is "misinformation". You're splitting hairs.
What's the worst, 200 out of a million? Whether or not you call that 'rare' is a personal choice, as rare is one of those weasel words.
I don't support this, but you're just blatantly lying again. Don't say that "this is what the bill does". At least admit that this is what you think the bill MAY do, or that this is what you fear.
From the idea of preventing sex selective abortion.
No, show me what country has this supposed principle.
But I'm specifically talking about NZ. Then again, they'd probably just fuck with the numbers like they did with the vaccine deaths and the Covid cases.
Oh right, I forgot that your worldview is completely immune to any outside evidence. Like any good ideologue, you judge the facts based on how well they fit your worldview, rather than the other way around.
Show me where it says that 'mentioning myocarditis' will get you jail time. Thanks.
Sex-selective abortions are legal everywhere abortion is, as far as I know.
Who makes up the majority of live births?
No, that's just your BS. When official health organizations admit it, it's not going to be censored.
Where did this principle come from?
Then pick any other country, where you also claim that women MURDER babies because they are male.
What's the worst, 200 out of a million? Whether or not you call that 'rare' is a personal choice, as rare is one of those weasel words.
I don't support this, but you're just blatantly lying again. Don't say that "this is what the bill does". At least admit that this is what you think the bill MAY do, or that this is what you fear.
No, show me what country has this supposed principle.
Oh right, I forgot that your worldview is completely immune to any outside evidence. Like any good ideologue, you judge the facts based on how well they fit your worldview, rather than the other way around.