Women's History Month soon...why don't we gather all the history they don't want people to know?
(media.kotakuinaction2.win)
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
Comments (71)
sorted by:
Okay, mentioning that it is neither rare nor mild is "misinformation". You're splitting hairs.
From the idea of preventing sex selective abortion.
But I'm specifically talking about NZ. Then again, they'd probably just fuck with the numbers like they did with the vaccine deaths and the Covid cases.
What's the worst, 200 out of a million? Whether or not you call that 'rare' is a personal choice, as rare is one of those weasel words.
I don't support this, but you're just blatantly lying again. Don't say that "this is what the bill does". At least admit that this is what you think the bill MAY do, or that this is what you fear.
No, show me what country has this supposed principle.
Oh right, I forgot that your worldview is completely immune to any outside evidence. Like any good ideologue, you judge the facts based on how well they fit your worldview, rather than the other way around.
Considering the head of the NHS who is in charge of reviewing the data is a vile man-hating feminist...that data isn't worth the energy used to make the pixels on your screen show it.
Everywhere where sex-selective abortions are banned?
I want to keep the discussion to the place we're talking about.
It's no different anywhere else, bud.
Jesus Christ, are you autistic? What countries are those, was the question. Third time now.
What is there to discuss, when you ignore any facts that contradict your worldview as either fake or the result of blackmail by wahmen.
That's true, and a rather sad indictment of the medical profession. Not one of them can be trusted to not be an ideologically corrupted sadist.
If it isn't obvious, I don't know. Start with everywhere that whined about "China's missing daughters".
There aren't any facts. They literally refuse to print the data. That, to me, is an admission of guilt.