A company that caters to liberal college students abandons mandatory vaccines while a company that caters to conservative working class (Carhartt) enforces it. Clown world indeed.
Didn't they "push back their implementation date" to February? Thought I saw that in their letter. As with all the companies which kept pushing back their "return to the office" date in 2020, they may just be buying time to see which way the wind is blowing.
The doubt that Starbucks' costumer demographics overlap significantly with those who question the jabs.
More likely scenario: their workforce is disproportionately non-white and therefore disproportionately unjabbed, so a mandate represents both an untenable corporate cost (too much lost labor) and a PR issue (firing too many brown people). The latter is, as always, cover for the former.
A company that caters to liberal college students abandons mandatory vaccines while a company that caters to conservative working class (Carhartt) enforces it. Clown world indeed.
Didn't they "push back their implementation date" to February? Thought I saw that in their letter. As with all the companies which kept pushing back their "return to the office" date in 2020, they may just be buying time to see which way the wind is blowing.
Only for select facilities, named in the letter.
The doubt that Starbucks' costumer demographics overlap significantly with those who question the jabs.
More likely scenario: their workforce is disproportionately non-white and therefore disproportionately unjabbed, so a mandate represents both an untenable corporate cost (too much lost labor) and a PR issue (firing too many brown people). The latter is, as always, cover for the former.
Ever been to a StarCucks? ALL tattooed, septum pierced white 20 somethings where I've been.
Carhartt has stopped catering to the working class in the last few years. They're chasing tranny money now. Never buying from them again