I think they are floundering for a new narrative because we are about to get a massive but harmless Omicron wave but they've conditioned their readers to fear a case graph going up so shit's getting thrown against the wall.
reality never bothered leftists. People are already saying that the reason omnicron is less severe is before a lot of people are vaccinated. Fuck this cult. I already discussed it with my wife and if our friends decide to cut ties with us so be it.
It's nothing new, this is what news media always does.
Every so often they release a semi-real admission of events that they completely bury so that later they can point out, "See? We're fair and balanced media that reports the truth!" and hopes you ignore the 10k articles they publish right after "debunking" their article that slightly touched the truth.
I was more interested of The New York Times allowing an article that is critical of booster shots.
I think they are floundering for a new narrative because we are about to get a massive but harmless Omicron wave but they've conditioned their readers to fear a case graph going up so shit's getting thrown against the wall.
reality never bothered leftists. People are already saying that the reason omnicron is less severe is before a lot of people are vaccinated. Fuck this cult. I already discussed it with my wife and if our friends decide to cut ties with us so be it.
It's nothing new, this is what news media always does.
Every so often they release a semi-real admission of events that they completely bury so that later they can point out, "See? We're fair and balanced media that reports the truth!" and hopes you ignore the 10k articles they publish right after "debunking" their article that slightly touched the truth.
Yeah, see my post about Aus Reichstag-y fire from yesterday…
They literally did that, for this particular event/occurrence, lol…
The reporting was so wildly inconsistent, so as to confuse readers as to what actually happened and who actually did it…