I can't tell if you're acknowledging that domestic work is work, or highlighting some particular time and place that women worked outside the home. There are careers that are suited towards women and allow them time to take care of their own children. A lot of times these careers involve helping other children/the elderly, such as teaching, nursing, and charity.
Yes, they also worked as maids, seamstresses, sweeps, inn keeps, bakers, dozens of other businesses before the 20th century and the rise of the professional feminist.
Guess the rich shouldn't have been greedy and pushed women into working which fucked it all up
Women already worked. In cities, they shared jobs equally, and still had big families.
I can't tell if you're acknowledging that domestic work is work, or highlighting some particular time and place that women worked outside the home. There are careers that are suited towards women and allow them time to take care of their own children. A lot of times these careers involve helping other children/the elderly, such as teaching, nursing, and charity.
Yes, they also worked as maids, seamstresses, sweeps, inn keeps, bakers, dozens of other businesses before the 20th century and the rise of the professional feminist.
The feminist propaganda would have no hold over women if traditional families were valued. There would probably be more children.
Desire doesn't matter.
A better analogy would be if the tiger was chained up or not.
If the tiger is restricted (traditional family values) it may still bite, but it's controllable.
If it's unchained, it WILL bite and you cannot control it.