The judge is arguing under the basis that social media is a publisher. Platforms are not given editorial privileges under section 230. This also completely ignores the premise that platforms are considered the public square. A federal judge legislating from the bench, again, and will never be held accountable.
Maybe this doesn't count since it's not social media, but not long ago YouTube won a case against PragerU and the judge ruled that they are not a public square.
The judge is arguing under the basis that social media is a publisher. Platforms are not given editorial privileges under section 230. This also completely ignores the premise that platforms are considered the public square. A federal judge legislating from the bench, again, and will never be held accountable.
Obama appointee.
I think it's even simpler: corporations are not people, thus are not citizens, thus have no rights.
Everything was lost the second corporations were given personhood.
Maybe this doesn't count since it's not social media, but not long ago YouTube won a case against PragerU and the judge ruled that they are not a public square.