You see, you don't give me the evidence. I'm supposed to believe you because you said so. I gave you anecdote why I don't believe it. Just because you are not satisfied with that response, don't go sperging on me on this thread. Sounds like you are the one still fully invested in continuing this silly argument, I don't. That's why I stopped responding on that thread.
I'm sure the guy who is complaining about "official history" without being able to tell what "official history" is, or present even one example of a history book he has a problem with (because he has not read any), is rull concerned about 'evidence'.
don't go sperging on me on this thread
I'll remind you that you engaged me, not vice versa.
That's why I stopped responding on that thread.
You stopped responding cause you couldn't back up your claims, and still can't.
You see, you don't give me the evidence. I'm supposed to believe you because you said so. I gave you anecdote why I don't believe it. Just because you are not satisfied with that response, don't go sperging on me on this thread. Sounds like you are the one still fully invested in continuing this silly argument, I don't. That's why I stopped responding on that thread.
I'm sure the guy who is complaining about "official history" without being able to tell what "official history" is, or present even one example of a history book he has a problem with (because he has not read any), is rull concerned about 'evidence'.
I'll remind you that you engaged me, not vice versa.
You stopped responding cause you couldn't back up your claims, and still can't.