I'm sure the guy who is complaining about "official history" without being able to tell what "official history" is, or present even one example of a history book he has a problem with (because he has not read any), is rull concerned about 'evidence'.
don't go sperging on me on this thread
I'll remind you that you engaged me, not vice versa.
That's why I stopped responding on that thread.
You stopped responding cause you couldn't back up your claims, and still can't.
I'm sure the guy who is complaining about "official history" without being able to tell what "official history" is, or present even one example of a history book he has a problem with (because he has not read any), is rull concerned about 'evidence'.
I'll remind you that you engaged me, not vice versa.
You stopped responding cause you couldn't back up your claims, and still can't.