I don't see it as risking your life for a company, I see it as simply doing the right thing. Robbing stores is wrong, and the criminals who do it are highly unlikely to ever be reformed. They're people who have a negative impact on the world, even if they occasionally do something good, it never outweighs their evil deeds. Blasting one is making the world a slightly better place.
And the store did the right thing and refused to fire him. But most stores have strict policies against defending the store from robbers, because they're afraid of liability. They made their choice; let them stew in it.
between the leftist state bringing the hammer of police power on anyone that stands up to their state sponsored terrorism, and the increasing unlikelihood of the person behind the counter being an owner instead of a wagie for a multinational megacorp, what incentive is there to resist?
Man, fuck that. Why risk your life for company that hates you and shares globalist politics anyway
I don't see it as risking your life for a company, I see it as simply doing the right thing. Robbing stores is wrong, and the criminals who do it are highly unlikely to ever be reformed. They're people who have a negative impact on the world, even if they occasionally do something good, it never outweighs their evil deeds. Blasting one is making the world a slightly better place.
I don't disagree, I wasn't talking about the legal side of things, you're of course right about that.
Only if the police did the right thing and refused to arrest him.
And the store did the right thing and refused to fire him. But most stores have strict policies against defending the store from robbers, because they're afraid of liability. They made their choice; let them stew in it.
between the leftist state bringing the hammer of police power on anyone that stands up to their state sponsored terrorism, and the increasing unlikelihood of the person behind the counter being an owner instead of a wagie for a multinational megacorp, what incentive is there to resist?