They keep using that phrase. I do not think it means what they think it means.
Also there was literally no "contestation" of the election because the US system provides no way to contest a presidential election if states don't send competing electors. The supreme court refused to hear the case. The news media refused to call it a contested election. But now it's a "violent contestation". And they don't see anything wrong with that chain of events.
Tell me you're a propaganda arm of the deep state without telling me.
International Institute for Democracy and "Electoral Assistance"
Says all we need to know.
The lack of any mention of Australia really broadcasts the right signal from Qatar State Propaganda.
Rofl, these fuckin' people.
They keep using that phrase. I do not think it means what they think it means.
Also there was literally no "contestation" of the election because the US system provides no way to contest a presidential election if states don't send competing electors. The supreme court refused to hear the case. The news media refused to call it a contested election. But now it's a "violent contestation". And they don't see anything wrong with that chain of events.
Tell me you're a propaganda arm of the deep state without telling me.