They keep using that phrase. I do not think it means what they think it means.
Also there was literally no "contestation" of the election because the US system provides no way to contest a presidential election if states don't send competing electors. The supreme court refused to hear the case. The news media refused to call it a contested election. But now it's a "violent contestation". And they don't see anything wrong with that chain of events.
Tell me you're a propaganda arm of the deep state without telling me.
They keep using that phrase. I do not think it means what they think it means.
Also there was literally no "contestation" of the election because the US system provides no way to contest a presidential election if states don't send competing electors. The supreme court refused to hear the case. The news media refused to call it a contested election. But now it's a "violent contestation". And they don't see anything wrong with that chain of events.
Tell me you're a propaganda arm of the deep state without telling me.