Where does the capitalism connection come from? Why would an "illiberal non-capitalist" society be any different?
Haven't you outright said before (and implied here) that education is nothing but the propaganda a society wants to push? I'm not entirely sure that's wrong, but don't see what liberal capitalism has to do with it. The only problem I link to capitalism is the standardized textbook which should have never been invented.
The Soviet Union revolutionized their education system, making it universal in a country that before that was mostly illiterate peasants. By the Cold War many people considered it one of the best examples of universal education in the world, and one of the big factors in them becoming a superpower.
Do you consider them liberal capitalists? Or would you say they just borrowed the idea?
I guess that is beside the point as you have explained how liberal capitalism is still the main problem. It's just that your vision of the current system is way outside my framework and would require a long essay to explain. To me capitalism is just synonymous with economics, which is a basic law of human nature.
I was just making a point about how this totalitarian society that was not thought of by anyone in the West as capitalist were the masters of universal education, but you already answered my question. I was editing the comment when you replied, but basically I think it would require a much longer essay then is appropriate here to explain your opposition to liberal capitalism and the alternative. Maybe some links to further reading would help.
It actually does work that way. Parents always had the option to pull their kids out of school if they didn’t like the education their children were receiving, the problem is that few parents cared because it was “free” daycare.
Nothing special, just another example of teachers conspiring to inject indoctrination into learning by positioning themselves as an elite class of scholars with secret knowledge that parents must defer to - like the old Catholic church before the reformation.
This time framing it as SCIENCE because that's in vogue today.
And they fucking ignore it anyways. They spy on kids, they abuse them if they are "privileged", they grade unequally, they spread propaganda, they punish the kids who go against it, they are political, they target kids with the personal information they find out about them, like when they find the kids with issues and convince them they must be transgender or whatever.
Are those skills of a good teacher? Telling white kids they are oppressors? Stalking the students online so they can convince them about self-mutilation intentionally behind their parents' backs?
Where does the capitalism connection come from? Why would an "illiberal non-capitalist" society be any different?
Haven't you outright said before (and implied here) that education is nothing but the propaganda a society wants to push? I'm not entirely sure that's wrong, but don't see what liberal capitalism has to do with it. The only problem I link to capitalism is the standardized textbook which should have never been invented.
The Soviet Union revolutionized their education system, making it universal in a country that before that was mostly illiterate peasants. By the Cold War many people considered it one of the best examples of universal education in the world, and one of the big factors in them becoming a superpower.
Do you consider them liberal capitalists? Or would you say they just borrowed the idea?
I guess that is beside the point as you have explained how liberal capitalism is still the main problem. It's just that your vision of the current system is way outside my framework and would require a long essay to explain. To me capitalism is just synonymous with economics, which is a basic law of human nature.
I was just making a point about how this totalitarian society that was not thought of by anyone in the West as capitalist were the masters of universal education, but you already answered my question. I was editing the comment when you replied, but basically I think it would require a much longer essay then is appropriate here to explain your opposition to liberal capitalism and the alternative. Maybe some links to further reading would help.
It actually does work that way. Parents always had the option to pull their kids out of school if they didn’t like the education their children were receiving, the problem is that few parents cared because it was “free” daycare.
Nothing special, just another example of teachers conspiring to inject indoctrination into learning by positioning themselves as an elite class of scholars with secret knowledge that parents must defer to - like the old Catholic church before the reformation.
This time framing it as SCIENCE because that's in vogue today.
Parents mostly don't understand teaching, and God help the "educators" if they ever do.
those who can, do
those who can't, teach
Those who can't teach, administrate.
And they fucking ignore it anyways. They spy on kids, they abuse them if they are "privileged", they grade unequally, they spread propaganda, they punish the kids who go against it, they are political, they target kids with the personal information they find out about them, like when they find the kids with issues and convince them they must be transgender or whatever.
Are those skills of a good teacher? Telling white kids they are oppressors? Stalking the students online so they can convince them about self-mutilation intentionally behind their parents' backs?