You know what's funny? Comments in that thread that dissent from OP are collapsed, EVEN IF THEY ARE MORE UPVOTED THAN OTHER ONES.
Like, they're not collapsed because they're mass-downvoted, or in the negative, so what does that mean?
Can subs hide comments they don't like, without actually removing them? Or is that Reddit itself, hiding ("collapsing") things that go against the agenda, even if the community itself agrees with them?
What gives, there?
Honestly, much like Youtube removing "dislikes" (aka downvotes, which fucking Reddit will probably do, for some posts, soon, if they don't already), that ^^ is almost as scary and fucked up as the post itself... :-/
Hearing from another sub that does this, apparently comments from people not subscribed will automatically be collapsed. That would be a subwide setting.
It's pretty hilarious. There's a lot of "Well we didn't know we would need a booster every 6 months, the science is changing because of new informations we're receiving". Yes, this is exactly what we've been telling you since day one. We should not force people to take something when we don't even know how long it will last, or if the immunity it's supposed to give is indeed an immunity (and not just a weak ass "protection").
Also what happened to "The Science™ is settled" then? I thought it was clear the vaccine was "Safe and Effective"? You mean it's actually not that effective?
This is an archive (to save Dom screeching about live Reddit links, or coming after me again, for that, lol) of how it looked a short time ago, minus my replies to some things which I hadn't written out yet: https://archive.md/fRzbJ
Fucking bed-wetting, pillow-biting, narcissistic sociopaths, the majority of these people.
They're hearing more anti booster talk because even people who went along with the first clot shot are wary of getting another one , then another one, etc.
You know what's funny? Comments in that thread that dissent from OP are collapsed, EVEN IF THEY ARE MORE UPVOTED THAN OTHER ONES.
Like, they're not collapsed because they're mass-downvoted, or in the negative, so what does that mean?
Can subs hide comments they don't like, without actually removing them? Or is that Reddit itself, hiding ("collapsing") things that go against the agenda, even if the community itself agrees with them? What gives, there?
Honestly, much like Youtube removing "dislikes" (aka downvotes, which fucking Reddit will probably do, for some posts, soon, if they don't already), that ^^ is almost as scary and fucked up as the post itself... :-/
I saw that on a few other peddit threads and thought I was just out of the loop of the censorship shenanigans.
Hearing from another sub that does this, apparently comments from people not subscribed will automatically be collapsed. That would be a subwide setting.
It's pretty hilarious. There's a lot of "Well we didn't know we would need a booster every 6 months, the science is changing because of new informations we're receiving". Yes, this is exactly what we've been telling you since day one. We should not force people to take something when we don't even know how long it will last, or if the immunity it's supposed to give is indeed an immunity (and not just a weak ass "protection").
Also what happened to "The Science™ is settled" then? I thought it was clear the vaccine was "Safe and Effective"? You mean it's actually not that effective?
Not effective, not safe
This is an archive (to save Dom screeching about live Reddit links, or coming after me again, for that, lol) of how it looked a short time ago, minus my replies to some things which I hadn't written out yet: https://archive.md/fRzbJ
Fucking bed-wetting, pillow-biting, narcissistic sociopaths, the majority of these people.
Fuckin' oath it's sad...
They're hearing more anti booster talk because even people who went along with the first clot shot are wary of getting another one , then another one, etc.