I'm not sure that's a fair comparison as stocks and the temperature aren't even related data sets.
What I find funny about the climate change "scientists" is they are the same ones that tell a history of dramatically different climates that would have just naturally occurred. The frozen North America where humans migrated over the Bering Strait by foot, for example. So I suppose we moved from that to the world we know in modern history because people farted too much? It wasn't from machinery. The more plausible explanation to me is that over time changes in average climate is just totally normal and natural.
Stocks have perfectly measured historical data usually down to the second or less in recent years. If they can't "model" those numbers into the future then there is no way they can predict climate based on past data.
"Climate" data is mostly unverified and unverifiable measurements at a completely inadequate and arbitrary granularity compared to the size of the planet. With no other data sets against which to compare predictions.
It is 100% made up and its only purpose is to push the commie agenda.
Stocks are game theory, and as such accurate prediction is impossible as the ability to predict changes the outcome.
Presumably there's no aliens or secret cabal with the power to secretly alter the climate to profit over having better knowledge than others that are gaming the environment.
There's no reason the overall climate shouldn't be predictable given enough knowledge other than human activity is unpredictable (invention of a low cost fusion reactor for instance). The problem is they don't have anywhere near the knowledge since experiments can't be done or replicated, and the more human activity effects the outcome the less predictable any forecast will be.
I'm not sure that's a fair comparison as stocks and the temperature aren't even related data sets.
What I find funny about the climate change "scientists" is they are the same ones that tell a history of dramatically different climates that would have just naturally occurred. The frozen North America where humans migrated over the Bering Strait by foot, for example. So I suppose we moved from that to the world we know in modern history because people farted too much? It wasn't from machinery. The more plausible explanation to me is that over time changes in average climate is just totally normal and natural.
Its an even less favorable comparison
Stocks have perfectly measured historical data usually down to the second or less in recent years. If they can't "model" those numbers into the future then there is no way they can predict climate based on past data.
"Climate" data is mostly unverified and unverifiable measurements at a completely inadequate and arbitrary granularity compared to the size of the planet. With no other data sets against which to compare predictions.
It is 100% made up and its only purpose is to push the commie agenda.
Stocks are game theory, and as such accurate prediction is impossible as the ability to predict changes the outcome.
Presumably there's no aliens or secret cabal with the power to secretly alter the climate to profit over having better knowledge than others that are gaming the environment.
There's no reason the overall climate shouldn't be predictable given enough knowledge other than human activity is unpredictable (invention of a low cost fusion reactor for instance). The problem is they don't have anywhere near the knowledge since experiments can't be done or replicated, and the more human activity effects the outcome the less predictable any forecast will be.
Weather is very much related to market prices. Ask any farmer.