https://archive.is/ReGdD the tweet about the suspension.
I don't know if youtube fucked all the the videos, but here are the rumble links.
https://rumble.com/vnovol-dc-comics-brave-new-superman-is-...-bisexual-special-guest-dean-cain.html in that one he talks about the rape story, the gay superman, and some other shit.
https://rumble.com/vnqi0v-youtube-gave-me-another-strike-heres-why.html and this is the one explaining what happened and talking about it.
https://rumble.com/vn5e8v-special-guest-alex-jones-on-great-reset-and-joe-rogan-triggers-leftists-aga.html and that is the video used to fuck with his channel.
Yeah but that's an actual tranny, who claims the refuge of trannydom. What I've read of this case is that the rapist is actually a crossdressing boy kid who makes no claim to be trans. Therefore they think they have the leeway to renounce him, as opposed to the non-tranny crossdressers they claim as their own.
There are no actual trannies. Transgenderism is something that John Money, a pedophile and a child torturer, made up. It does not exist, and neither do they. They're just slightly different flavors of sex offenders and deviants.
In this case I'm not using 'actual tranny' to mean anything more than someone who fits into the left's definition of trans. Which, when it comes down to it, means someone who says 'I'm trans'. This rapist kid is not saying that, to my knowledge, and that's what gives the narrative spinners their leeway.
edit: it's entirely possible that the reporting has made it seem like he doesn't claim trans identity when he does, point being this is a narrative war
Leftists don't have definitions. They just have different lies for different occasions, like you or I would put on a pair of shoes.
Case in point.
The truth is there is no difference between a crossdresser and a tranny, because both of those things can be distilled down into the truth.
They're evil. They are inhuman freaks and deviants.
Flawless. Saving this.
Define “true trans”…