Well yeah but this shit (faggotry) is common in species from fish, to birds, to insects, to mammals.
This is not about controlling populations as it may even predate predetion ! it looks like nature perceives some individuals as trash and give them the gay gene as banishment from the genetic pool!
"Predates predation" tells me that it IS a population control mechanism - one that was mostly replaced by predation, probably.
And I doubt it's "random", there's probably some latent "recessive" gene that can be carried by straights and passed on to a dead-end offspring when two normies meet up, but I think they're still arguing over the genetic component (it's simply harder to map genes to behaviours than it is to physical properties, especially when no one's willing to do the sort of experiments on humans that they do on fruit flies or rats for to find out - not to mention all the white noise of recent cultural conditioning making faggotry the biggest new fad.)
Anyway, that would be why it might be present in the wild, but at very low levels most of the time. But take away predation (and disease)? It goes nuts, just like when you take away ANY limiters.
I agree with you given the mouse utopia but it seems to be very old like collaborating single cell organism old where some genes in the chain simply lost their ability to multiply. A wild speculation i know but if this is the case it looks like a primitive immune system to me.
Faggotry is an evolutionary thing, nature tries to kick useless meatbugs out of the gene pool.
A low constant supply would be a natural way to control populations; in the absence of predators and proper plague, I bet its frequency goes up.
Well yeah but this shit (faggotry) is common in species from fish, to birds, to insects, to mammals.
This is not about controlling populations as it may even predate predetion ! it looks like nature perceives some individuals as trash and give them the gay gene as banishment from the genetic pool!
LOL there is no gay gene, and never has been. No gay allele strands either, it's why the Left has abandoned that talking point: https://www.nature.com/articles/d41586-019-02585-6
"Predates predation" tells me that it IS a population control mechanism - one that was mostly replaced by predation, probably.
And I doubt it's "random", there's probably some latent "recessive" gene that can be carried by straights and passed on to a dead-end offspring when two normies meet up, but I think they're still arguing over the genetic component (it's simply harder to map genes to behaviours than it is to physical properties, especially when no one's willing to do the sort of experiments on humans that they do on fruit flies or rats for to find out - not to mention all the white noise of recent cultural conditioning making faggotry the biggest new fad.)
Anyway, that would be why it might be present in the wild, but at very low levels most of the time. But take away predation (and disease)? It goes nuts, just like when you take away ANY limiters.
I agree with you given the mouse utopia but it seems to be very old like collaborating single cell organism old where some genes in the chain simply lost their ability to multiply. A wild speculation i know but if this is the case it looks like a primitive immune system to me.