Obituary of a woman killed by the vax is the wildest obit I've ever read
(obits.oregonlive.com)
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
Comments (47)
sorted by:
My theory is the relatively few young people who have bad reactions (including death) to the vaccine would also be among the relatively few young people who have bad reactions (including death) to the coof. In either case it's the spike proteins doing damage (in natural coof the spikes cleave off). That being said it's insane to require people to put themselves in danger even if they are reducing their overall risk. If my theory is true the choice is "100 percent chance of small dose of spikes" vs "unknown percent chance of big dose of spikes" and all this while not knowing how badly you react to spikes.
I've considered that but it's also possible many of the vaccine complications emerge from administration, not properly aspirating a needle, injecting directly into the bloodstream vs just injecting into a muscle, etc. I've had friends who had COVID then months later got vaccinated and had incredibly severe reactions to the latter but not the former. In any case, I had COVID, it wasn't too bad. I don't need to roll the dice again with a vaccine.
The "vaccine" does not function how they claim it does and is not safe for human use.
At this point I am beyond convinced that any attributable positive outcomes from the "vaccine" are placebo and assumed affects. It does not prevent infection or spread, it does not protect against symptoms, and it causes your body to purge itself of the ability to create a natural response to corona type viruses.
That there's anyone who advocates for this garbage still is telling.
DrRollerGate has a substack article based on UK data that would suggest the vaccine reduces chance of death by 90% for most age groups, https://drrollergator.substack.com/p/uk-surveillance-data-first-look. An order of magnitude worse than the mainstream number but an order of magnitude better than unvaccinated.
See, I just don't see it that way.
There's nothing to control for.
His model is based on limited observational data. However, he's looking in on a system with terrible reporting standards that intentionally skew all sorts of data metrics.
We're all just led to assume that vaccines give better outcomes.
In regards to deaths it's my understanding that it falls almost entirely to the method of treatment used. For the longest time hospitals have been using the sedate and intubate method for severe cases, which highly trends with increased death. Inversely, those that treat early with things like Regeneron or Ivermectin show very limited deaths which is almost impossible to find in hospitals.
Then there's the big issue of symptomatic reporting. I know for a fact that where I am virtually all the case data is worthless for statistical or clinical usage. There's individual hospital groups 30m to an hour away from each other that have wildly different standards and procedures.
Based on all I've seen I just don't see a difference in terms of covid outcomes, and in fact see a negative trend by vaccination because it causes its own issues.
Do you really believe that? Be honest, use your adult mind.
Seriously, you cannot just accept this convenient excuse. The truth is right in front of you!