By now almost everyone proboably has heard from the Twitch leak that happened yesterday.
Even a person of undefined gender over at Kotaku saw it scrolling through their mentions while wondering what to complain about next. So obviously they wrote an article about it.
Of course it wasn't about the lack of security of twitch. Or their shitty coding standards, like hardcoding server credentials (and uploading them to their git (link stolen from reddit LSF)).
Or their lack of response by not notifying their users by mail that their userdata might have been compromised.
No. It's about that only 3 women are in the top 100 of earners. And only 1 female PoC.
Which can only lead to one conclusion: "Twitch has not done enough to support women and other marginalized streamers on its platform."
Well women make their money on Onlyfans, they use Twitch to find the 10 to 13 year old boys with access to mommies credit card to buy access to see videos their rotten crotches. If they put in the onlyfans money, they'd see that women dominate Twitch. But hey, Twitch can't put out hardcore porn and still be part of Amazon, although I'm sure Twitch execs are chomping at the bit to get into porn, after all they got a large market of children to pervert and groom to be simps.
Sources mysteriously silent, though, on the opposite being the case on OnlyFans.
P.S. Also everyone was realizing that women made huge amounts of money on OnlyFans in a way men simply can't. This is probably put out there to try to invade that (realistic) narrative.
Speaking of which, how do we know these twitch streamer numbers are real at all? We know they push these lies. This seems like the kind of deliberate op one would run, just push out some fake numbers. It's right in line with their coming after your jobs and your money in pushing the lie that that 'white men' make more money than others.
Or their shitty coding standards, like hardcoding server credentials (and uploading them to their git
How is this even possible? Any large IT company has static analyzers, automated security vulnerability assessments, code submission/deployment reviewal processes, and all types of business minutia. I honestly don't know how any developer or team could fuck up this badly.
As for the code leak, that is incredibly impressive of Amazon, but unless there is a lot of scintillating unique IP baked into it - maybe things like video quality adjustments assuming they aren't the usual legal scams - then I don't think it will matter much in the long run.
The factors that made Twitch successful have always been challengeable. Google's a great example of this given their early acquisition of YouTube. Different priorities, or competencies when it comes to execution, have led to the status quo; either can be overturned, but it doesn't require the data breach.
By now almost everyone proboably has heard from the Twitch leak that happened yesterday.
Even a person of undefined gender over at Kotaku saw it scrolling through their mentions while wondering what to complain about next. So obviously they wrote an article about it.
Of course it wasn't about the lack of security of twitch. Or their shitty coding standards, like hardcoding server credentials (and uploading them to their git (link stolen from reddit LSF)).
Or their lack of response by not notifying their users by mail that their userdata might have been compromised.
No. It's about that only 3 women are in the top 100 of earners. And only 1 female PoC.
Which can only lead to one conclusion: "Twitch has not done enough to support women and other marginalized streamers on its platform."
Well women make their money on Onlyfans, they use Twitch to find the 10 to 13 year old boys with access to mommies credit card to buy access to see videos their rotten crotches. If they put in the onlyfans money, they'd see that women dominate Twitch. But hey, Twitch can't put out hardcore porn and still be part of Amazon, although I'm sure Twitch execs are chomping at the bit to get into porn, after all they got a large market of children to pervert and groom to be simps.
Fucking exactly. The whole thing is a machine so amoral that the banks tried to get the fuck out of it.
I could write an essay of all the awful things JPM has done, but even they consider women's racket a liability to their reputation.
Sources mysteriously silent, though, on the opposite being the case on OnlyFans.
P.S. Also everyone was realizing that women made huge amounts of money on OnlyFans in a way men simply can't. This is probably put out there to try to invade that (realistic) narrative.
Speaking of which, how do we know these twitch streamer numbers are real at all? We know they push these lies. This seems like the kind of deliberate op one would run, just push out some fake numbers. It's right in line with their coming after your jobs and your money in pushing the lie that that 'white men' make more money than others.
4k a month, and that's just a rough average.
The numbers could be fake. They don't entirely check out with what I'd believe to be true. Definitely wouldn't put it past them.
by that, they would mean: artificially inflate the popularity of someone because they are black.
How is this even possible? Any large IT company has static analyzers, automated security vulnerability assessments, code submission/deployment reviewal processes, and all types of business minutia. I honestly don't know how any developer or team could fuck up this badly.
As for the code leak, that is incredibly impressive of Amazon, but unless there is a lot of scintillating unique IP baked into it - maybe things like video quality adjustments assuming they aren't the usual legal scams - then I don't think it will matter much in the long run.
The factors that made Twitch successful have always been challengeable. Google's a great example of this given their early acquisition of YouTube. Different priorities, or competencies when it comes to execution, have led to the status quo; either can be overturned, but it doesn't require the data breach.