the only thing the 2 parties can agree on. Giving Israel more money
(media.kotakuinaction2.win)
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
Comments (90)
sorted by:
Good. Defensive system, less people dying less destruction. And America got all the R&D for it.
The only objections I see are from stormcucks who want more dead people.
Ah yes, not wanting to be the world's police force = white supremacy.
You fulfill the stereotype so completely that I'm starting to think you might be the stormfronter.
I'm sure that's your issue with them.
Ah yes there it is one or my favorite stormcuckery proving that he doesn't care about another holocaust, nor cares about people dying. Not he cares that the US is pretty much getting back all they paid forand more with the iron dome.
Amazing how you prove the stereotype and me right with one single post.
Give me a challenge, don't make it so easy.
That's not how it works.
If your defense is impenetrable you can use your offensive systems without restraint. There's no incentive to hold back because you don't have to fear retaliation.
Unless you only value the lives on one side of a conflict, a defensive system is effectively just as destructive as an offensive one.
Wow now that's a nice spin off. Israel always held back, even before and after iron dome with its military. You just want more dead people. Israel could have flattened Gaza multiple times yet they didn't. Because they value life.
I don't think we need to fund any of it. The Israelis are probably more than happy to fund it themselves.
They were having issues getting the extra funding to finish the project. America, with its funding basically helped finish it and then as a bonus, got the know-how for it.