The alphabet mafia actually started there and then they had to scale back because it wasn't palatable to normal people. Hence the massive pro-faggot media blitz starting in the 1970s that has been massively ramping up for the last about two decades.
Specifically, the "slippery slope fallacy" is only a problem if you present just one data point and assume the end.
Similar to basic geometry, you need at least two points to draw a line (or a ray, in this case). The more points you have, the stronger your argument.
At this point, we've got a thousand data points that all match very closely with "Elite pedophiles want to fuck your kids, and are attempting to re-shape your society so you can't stop them." You're no longer assuming the end from a single action, but a consistent and organized pattern of action.
It's always proceeding towards "Not letting me do sexual stuff with your kids is illegal"
The alphabet mafia actually started there and then they had to scale back because it wasn't palatable to normal people. Hence the massive pro-faggot media blitz starting in the 1970s that has been massively ramping up for the last about two decades.
The sad thing is it is all documented, every step, every move, and in return they called it a slippery slope.
And? a slippery slope isn't always a fallacy.
Only the ignorant and liars act like slippery slope is always a fallacy.
Specifically, the "slippery slope fallacy" is only a problem if you present just one data point and assume the end.
Similar to basic geometry, you need at least two points to draw a line (or a ray, in this case). The more points you have, the stronger your argument.
At this point, we've got a thousand data points that all match very closely with "Elite pedophiles want to fuck your kids, and are attempting to re-shape your society so you can't stop them." You're no longer assuming the end from a single action, but a consistent and organized pattern of action.